| CBS Research Resources |
There is are several lines of research within the CBS community at all levels including basic, analog and applied. As such, there are a number of resources to aid you in conducting research in ACT/RFT and Contextual Behavioral Science.
We also have compiled several summaries of existing ACT/RFT research to make consuming the research simpler for you.
| Research Groups |
In addition to the resources below, there are several formal and informal groups of folks conducting research on particular topics, within clinical practice, and in basic and applied RFT. Whether you are interested in conducting research on your own or in a research lab there are often opportunities to collaborate with others in your area of interest. Formally, there are several Special Interest Groups (SIGs) being created, with members all over the world. Informally, folks often share research ideas and tips for developing projects.
There is and a pending Research in Practice Network SIG (aka, the Behavioral Collective), and a group of researchers interested in sharing their ideas for conducting online interventions.
If you have an interest in developing a research group or a place to share ideas, consider contacting others with similar interests, networking, or start creating a Special Interest Group. A good place to start is by emailing the main ACT and RFT listservs or colleagues who may have similar interests or check out the research labs and training groups page for information about research interests.
Please be sure to also check out the RFT sections of the site and the newly formed Relational Frame Theory SIG.
The ACT / RFT tradition is committed to a high standard of empirical evaluation, including not just controlled assessment and evaluations of outcomes but also specification and evaluation of the putative processes of change, and linkage of these processes to a basic program of research that seeks to explain them in terms of functional behavioral principles, including those drawn from RFT.
The efficacy and effectiveness data on ACT are positive, but preliminary. A recent (July 2008) PowerPoint presentation of the evidence can be downloaded above. Also above is a table showing effect sizes for the ACT outcome literature. The most recent meta-analysis, Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, & Lillis, 2006, was published in Behaviour Research and Therapy in January 2006 and is available in the publications list or by clicking on the emboldened link.
ACT is not yet formally an empirically supported treatment on EST lists, though it is approaching or perhaps exceeding the standards for that status in some areas, such as smoking, pain, and psychosis, awaiting appearance of publications in press or under submission and on review by authorities responsible for such lists.
We recommend ACT on an experimental basis with any problem that fits the underlying model (e.g., the problem appears to involve cognitive fusion, or experiential avoidance, or a lack of clarity of values, and resulting inactivity, inflexibility, and ineffectiveness) provided it is used with systematic evaluation and there is a good reason not to use existing ESTs first (e.g., if they have already failed; client rejects their use). We think that approach is particularly appropriate for the problems in the following table, since at least some efficacy or effectiveness data are available. The stronger the data are in a given, the stronger we can make this recommendation.
This table lists only published data though if additional major studies are coming and we have actually seen the data in detail they may be mentioned as well. We have divided the data into randomized controlled trials and other types of studies – e.g., pre-post designs or single case designs. Only outcomes studies with real patients are included, not analogs. "Published" data include theses and dissertations. See the publications page for detailed information. This table is current as of July 2008 but the literature is moving quickly and it takes a while to update pages like this. For a more detailed list of outcome studies and other empirical research you can download the "ACT Handout" and/or check the research summaries posted on the website, which are updated regularly:
ACT Data
| Depression | 4 RCTs; 3 other. Some indication that it is superior to CBT in some settings. Evidence of a distinct process. |
| Anxiety / Stress / OCD | 4 RCTs; 11 other. Data supporting the application of ACT with a number of different problems related to anxiety and stress. Some indication that it is superior to CBT in some settings, but also data that it can be beaten by traditional BT in minor anxiety problems. Evidence of changes in ACT processes. |
| Psychosis | 2 RCTs; 5 other. Not yet compared to other psychosocial methods beyond support but effects are good for amazingly small interventions. Done in addition to antipsychotic medication. Mediated by ACT processes. |
| Substance abuse | 2 RCTs; 3 other. Some indication that it does better than existing pharmacotherapy methods, or supplements their effects. |
| Smoking | 2 RCTs; 1 other. 1 other RCT under review also found good outcomes. Indication that it does better than existing pharmacotherapy methods, or supplements their effects. |
| Chronic Pain | 2 RCTs; 7 other, including three decent sized effectiveness trials. Good outcomes. No good head to head comparisons with empirically supported alternative methods yet. Works through ACT relevant processes. |
| Prejudice and burn out | 2 RCTs; 1 crossover. Beats multicultural counseling and education alone. Works through ACT relevant processes. Helps in both stigma and burnout. Other good studies completed and on the way. |
| Marital problems | 1 other. Very limited data. |
| Eating disorder | 1 other. Very limited data. |
| Sexual deviation | 2 other. Very limited data. |
| Dually diagnosed | 1 RCT (sub-analysis). 1 other. Promising but limited data. |
| Self Harm / BPD | 1 RCT that mixed ACT with DBT. Extremely good outcomes but no follow up. Did move ACT relevant processes. |
| Epilepsy | 2 RCTs. Very good outcomes on both seizures and quality of life. 1 year follow up. Mediated by ACT processes. |
| Diabetes management | 1 RCT. Good outcomes at follow up on self management and glucose control. Mediated by ACT processes. |
| Weight maintenance | 1 RCT. Good outcomes which were mediated through ACT processes. |
| Augmenting training in other therapies | 2 RCTs. Found ACT can increase the adoption of evidence-based psychotherapy methods by clinicians and is mediated through ACT processes. |
| Coping with cancer | 1 RCT; 1 Other. Preliminary data suggests ACT can improve coping with cancer. One other completed RCT shows ACT is more helpful than traditional CBT in dealing with end stage cancer and works through a different process. |
| Sports performance | 3 Other. Very limited data suggesting ACT can improve performance in various sports. |
There are some data on effectiveness (see the "publications" section and effectiveness study summary page). Thus, we feel that we can recommend ACT to systems of care provided they use it under the limitation suggested above and will work with us to train it properly, and to evaluate its impact.
A number of instruments have been developed to measure ACT-specific processes. This section of the site will provide more information about these instruments, including downloads when available.
Measures are being developed very rapidly, and we encourage developers to contribute updates to this section of the site as often as possible. Interested parties are also encouraged to join the ACT listserv to learn of updated measures. Click on an instrument below to learn more about it.
ACBS Members: If you have an ACT-specific measure you would like listed here, click on the "add child page" link at the bottom of this page. When adding your content, remember that you can attach relevant files and documents.
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (AAQ-II)
The AAQ-II was developed in order to establish an internally consistent measure of ACT’s model of mental health and behavioral effectiveness. Although the original AAQ (Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda and Lillis, 2006), obtaining sufficient alpha levels for it has at times been a problem. It appears that there are several reasons for this (e.g., scale brevity, item wording, item selection procedures), and they were addressed in developing the AAQ-II. As a result, it is recommended that researchers and practitioners use this newer scale instead of the original AAQ (which from here forward will be termed the AAQ-I).
The AAQ-II was designed to assess the same construct as the AAQ-I and, indeed, the two scales correlate at .82. Thus, the AAQ-I can still be used, and findings based on it are still relevant, but it is perhaps psychometrically safer to use the AAQ-II. The reference for the AAQ-II is: Bond, F.W., Hayes, S.C., Baer, R.A., Carpenter, K.M., Orcutt, H.K., Waltz, T. & Zettle, R.D. (Submitted).
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. (Note that authorship order was alphabetically determined for Carpenter, Orcutt, Waltz, and Zettle.)
What do we call ACT's model of mental health and behavioral effectiveness? (Or, what does the AAQ-I and -II measure?)
[Taken from Bond et al. (Submitted)]
When ACT was originally developed, the overarching term for its underlying model was experiential avoidance – the attempt to alter the form, frequency, or situational sensitivity of negative private events (e.g., thoughts, feelings, and physiological sensations), even when doing so leads to behavioral difficulties (Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette, & Strosahl, 1996). Acceptance was the term used to positively describe this model; thus, it is defined as the willingness to experience (i.e., not alter the form, frequency, or sensitivity of) unwanted private events, in the pursuit of one’s values and goals.
The ACT model has matured over the years, with more emphasis on the dynamic and flexible fit between context, private experiences and valued action, which have always been inherent in the model. Such flexibility is seen when ACT therapists note that sometimes persisting in behavior is helpful, while at other times changing it is helpful: it depends upon the value- and goal-related opportunities that are available in a given context. Furthermore, as other parts of the ACT model are now given emphasis (e.g., cognitive defusion, contacting the present moment, mindfulness, and perspective-taking), experiential avoidance and, hence, acceptance are taking on a narrower meaning and are being used less often as terms for the overarching model (Hayes et al., 2006). Instead, the term psychological flexibility (or flexibility) is now being used to describe this model. It is defined as the ability to fully contact the present moment and the thoughts and feelings it contains without needless defense, and, depending upon what the situation affords, persisting or changing in behavior in the pursuit of goals and values (Hayes et al., 2006). While experiential avoidance and acceptance are still useful and acceptable ways to describe this construct, psychological flexibility is the more current and overarching term. In addition, it needs to be acknowledged that in some contexts (e.g., industrial-organizational psychology) it is important to speak of this domain positively (acceptance or flexibility) and in other contexts (e.g., psychopathology) it is easier to speak of it negatively (experiential avoidance or psychological inflexibility). These differences are terminological, not substantive.
The AAQ-II and key psychometric findings for the scale can be found below. Older versions of the AAQ (i.e., AAQ-9, AAQ-16 and AAQ-49) are also listed below.
There are more specific acceptance and defusion measures available. A good measure has been developed in the area of smoking (contact Elizabeth Gifford for more information: elizgifford@earthlink.net); a pain measure developed from the earliest versions of the AAQ called the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ; see attachments below) has been published and worked very well in this area (contact Lance McCracken for more information: Lance.McCracken@rnhrd-tr.swest.nhs.uk).
Several AAQ measures for specific problems and populations are posted under Disease and disorder specific AAQ variations.
There are also a variety of translated versions of the AAQ and AAQ-II posted under ACT measures in Languages Other than English.
Other values measures are under development.
Kelly Wilson (kwilson@olemiss.edu) or Matthew Smout (matthew.smout@saugov.sa.gov.au) are working on other approaches, and you may want to contact them.
This is a new approach developed by J. T. Blacklege and Joe Ciarocchi at the University of Wollongong.
In an August 2005 email J. T. said this
Joseph Ciarrochi & I (with invaluable suggestions from Steve) have just finished designing two new ACT values questionnaires that borrow elements from Sheldon's Personal Striving assessment form (Joseph discovered Kennon Sheldon's work a while back and it pointed us in a direction we felt might enhance ACT values assessment).
One is a full-length form called the Personal Values Questionnaire (which measures all 9 ACT values domains); the second is called the Social Values Survey (which measures only social, family, and couples relationships) that we tailored for a brief intervention with young adolescents.
There is currently no psychometric data for either (they are changed enough that Sheldon's Personal Striving data is largely irrelevant), though we will be validating the SVS on a sample of 8th graders in a few weeks, and validating the PVQ on a university student sample early next year. Please feel more than free to validate these questionnaires on any samply you see fit (just let us know--we'd love to see the data). The format of the questionnaire is close enough to Sheldon's for us to expect the measures to have similarly reasonable psychometric properties, but, of course, who knows until we see data.
We had two primary purposes in mind while we were designing these instruments. First, we wanted to describe each values domain in a way likely to influence subjects to write relatively ACT-consistent values--even if these subjects had not been exposed to ACT therapy. As we all know, ACT talks about values in a different way than the term is usually used--and it's thus hard to expect someone not familiar with ACT to state a value in an ACT-consistent way without interacting with a therapist.. We wanted to make it clear to subjects that by value, we are referring to unilateral actions that are likely to lead to increased vitality, meaning, purpose--not static end states that appear implicitly out of one's control. In other words, to avoid getting responses like "I value close friendships", we included prompts like, "What kinds of friendships would you most like to build? If you were able to be the best friend possible, how would you behave toward your friends? For example, you might value building friendships that are supportive, considerate, caring, accepting, loyal, or honest—but choose for yourself which qualities you would most like to bring to your friendships. " Some subtle changes from wording used on previous versions of values questionnaires, but we felt the 'build' theme, along with examples, seemed to provide the kind of prompts that might be more helpful.
Second, we wanted to include Likert-scale questions that assessed things like how much each stated value might be a function of things like pliance or experiential avoidance. Steve oriented us back toward RFT/rule governed behaviour terms that capture what we were trying to assess: as it stands now, question one under each values domain on the SVS and PVQ assesses pliance, question 2 assesses avoidant tracking, and questions 3 & 4 assess augmentals. There are also items that get at importance of each value, effectiveness in moving toward it, etc. As it stands (using Sheldon's scoring algorithms and common sense), subtracting the sum of items 1 & 2 from the sum of items 3 & 4 would yield a sort of 'value purity' score that tells us to what degree a subject/client values the stated value for the reasons we'd hope for from an ACT perspective (higher positive score = greater 'purity' of the value; negative score means the 'value' is actually a function of pliance and/or avoidance).
We've also similarly updated the SVS. Please use this version rather than the previously posted one.
We were a bit reluctant to do this as it basically invalidates what little prior data there is for the Personal Values Questionnaire, but it made sense to us under the circumstances.
We’ve gone through two sets of reformatting and rewording the instrument. The first ‘re-draft’ was spurred by Ann Bailey, who rightfully noted that the wording of some of the Likert items was a bit complicated for those with a sub-college writing level and that the ordering of the Likert questions did not flow very well. This re-draft has been up on the ACBS site for a couple of years now.
The most recent changes occurred late last year. In the process of translating the instrument into German, Andrew Gloster and two of his doctoral students at Dresden Technical University noted that the prompts provided for the domain-specific values narratives differed across domains.
I had initially done this to provide a variety of ways of talking about values in the hope that subjects who had not been through ACT therapy might still ‘get’ what a value is. Andrew, I think rightfully, questioned this strategy as the different prompts might differentially cue different qualities of responses across domains, resulting in narratives (and subsequently, Likert ratings on those narratives) that might be functionally different.
So, in advance of that translation, we decided on a uniform values narrative prompt to be used across all domains. That served as the basis for the German translation, which I’ve also attached. I’m posting both of these on the ACBS site, but wanted to send them here as well as I know some others have used or plan to use the PVQ for research, etc (Martin Cernval from Uppsala University will be beginning a Swedish translation soon, for example).
I thought about further modifying the instrument (e.g., I really like Kelly Wilson’s addition of Parenting and Aesthetics values domains to the VLQ), but the instrument is beastly enough already. Functionally, it’s still the same instrument—except, hopefully, the aspects of the original instrument that functioned to confuse some subjects and potentially yield differentially ‘ACT-consistent’ (for lack of a better phrase) across domains have been eliminated!
The Valued Living Questionnaire is a simple questionnaire originally developed as a clinical tool. It's categories map relatively closely to the categories in the original ACT book (no surprise, since I authored both). I have also added a short working guide to its use. We have a paper describing its basic psychometric properties. A preprint is available here on the ACBS site Download Manuscript. The manuscript contains a copy of the VLQ. Feel free to email me Kelly G. Wilson for any updates. Also, to get a better flavor of the values work, I would recommend reading my chapter with Amy Murrell in the Mindfulness and Acceptance book. The chapter is also available here on this site: Values Work in ACT.
peace all,
Kelly
This is an approach developed by Tobias Lundgren and JoAnne Dahl at the University of Uppsala and successful used in a recent study on reducing epileptic seizures with ACT.
see attachement - & feel free to change it as you like - one is a word doc. & then a jpeg
The ACT daily diary and weekly report (see attachments below) can be clinically useful in monitoring progress.
This page includes a list of translated ACT measures. As a courtesy, if you use these versions in research it is common to contact the translator and let them know of the study -- certainly before publishing it.
AAQ translated in Chinese.
Author contact information:
Ai-Ti Tseng
Department of Psychology
National Cheng Chi University, Taiwan
93752006@nccu.edu.tw
Also here: http://www.contextualpsychology.org/questionnaire_dacceptation_et_daction
AAQ translated in Hebrew.
Liad Bareket-Bojmel
Department of Behavioral Sciences
Ben-Gurion University
liadbar@bgu.ac.il
Spanish version of the AAQ.
References:
Barraca, J. (2004). Spanish Adaptation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ). International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, (3), 505-515.
16 question AAQ in Korean.
Courtsey of HEO, Jaehong.
AAQ-II translated in Dutch.
Version française de l'AAQ-II à paraître dans la Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée. Les résultats indiquent que la version française du questionnaire d'acceptation et d'action-II est fiable et valide. Elle peut donc être utilisée en recherche comme en clinique. [French version of AAQ-II (in press in European Review of Applied Psychology; Abstract below)]
Résumé: L'évitement d'expériences psychologiques douloureuses a été choisi comme cible privilégiée par plusieurs nouvelles approches thérapeutiques issues des thérapies comportementales et cognitives. La tentative de suppression des événements psychologiques désagréables conduit à une perte de la flexibilité psychologique fortement corrélée avec un nombre important et varié de troubles psychologiques. Ces nouvelles approches thérapeutiques tentent d'accroître l'acceptation afin de lutter contre cette rigidité psychologique. Parmi ces approches, la thérapie d'acceptation et d'engagement (ACT) évalue la flexibilité psychologique au moyen du questionnaire d'acceptation et d'action (AAQ-II), qui présente de bonnes propriétés psychométriques. Une version française de l'AAQ-II est ici évaluée sur un groupe de 210 sujets témoins et de 118 patients souffrant de troubles anxieux ou dépressifs. La version française de l'AAQ-II présente une bonne consistance interne. Sa validité concourante comme sa validité de construit semblent solides. Le questionnaire est fiable dans une évaluation en test-retest. La structure factorielle à un facteur de la version francophone de l'AAQ-II est la même que celle de la version originale. Ces résultats assurent une utilisation de la version française de l'AAQ-II en recherche comme en pratique clinique.
[FRENCH TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF THE ACCEPTANCE & ACTION QUESTIONNAIRE (AAQ-II)
Keywords: Acceptance & action questionnaire (AAQ-II), Acceptance and commitment therapy, Psychological flexibility
Abstract: Avoidance of painful psychological experience has been chosen as the prime target by several new therapeutic approaches derived from cognitive and behavioral therapies. Attempts to suppress unpleasant emotional events lead to a loss of psychological flexibility strongly correlated with a significant number and variety of psychological disorders. These new therapeutic approaches attempt to increase acceptance in order to decrease this psychological rigidity. Among these approaches, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) measures psychological flexibility by mean of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), which presents good psychometric properties. A French version of the AAQ-II was evaluated in a group of 210 control subjects and 118 patients with anxiety disorders or depression. The French version of the AAQ-II presents good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.76-0.82). Its concurrent validity and construct validity appear strong. The questionnaire is reliable in test-retest evaluation. The one-factor structure of the French version of the AAQ-II reproduces the structure of the original version. These results ensure the use of the French version of the AAQ-II in research as well as in clinical practice.]
AAQ-II translated in Japanese.
Naoko Kishita, Tetsuya Yamamoto, & Hironori Shimada
Author contact information:
Naoko Kishita
Graduate School of Human Sciences,
Waseda University, Japan
sun_village@suou.waseda.jp
Translated AAQ-II in Norwegian.
Norsk konsensusversjon (backtranslated), mars 2009. Forhåpentligvis vil det gjøres en valideringsstudie av den i nærmeste fremtid. Denne versjonen er utarbeidet av (i alfabetisk rekkefølge):
Roar Fosse PhD
Børge Holden dr.philos.
Didrik Heggdal Psykologspesialist
Steffen Holthe Psykolog
Trym Nordstrand Jacobsen Cand.Psyk.
Ayna B. Johansen PhD
Lars Mariero Med.Stud.
(for spørsmål kan Trym Nordstrand Jacobsen nåes på trym_n_jacobsen@yahoo.no)
AAQ-II translated in Portuguese.
Here is an article describing the development of the AAQ-II developed by researchers in Mexico. At the end of the article is the measure.
AAQ-II translated in Swedish by JoAnne Dahl.
German 22-item AAQ.
This German version of the AAQ was used in an upcoming study by these authors
The 22 item version (the one you can score all vaidated ways) of the AAQ-I in Swedish.
Translated by Rikard Calmbro and Henrik Torneskog. The translators can be reached at calmbro@hotmail.com.
The Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ; Hollon & Kendall, 1980). The ATQ measures depressogenic thought frequency. This measure is commonly used in depression studies examining the impact of cognitive therapy. However, the ATQ-B is a revision to this measure by Jacobson and colleagues (ATQ-B, Addis & Jacobson, 1996) aimed at assessing the believability of these depressive thoughts if they occur and it has been used as a proxy measure for defusion in the ACT community. We recommend that you use both subscales; the ATQ-F for frequency of automatic/depressive thoughts and the ATQ-B for believability of (or fusion with) these thoughts.
Scoring for the measure is typically a simple sum score for the F sub scale and the B sub scale. The F and B scores can be used in analyses as separate entities and have been shown to be differentially related to outcomes (e.g., frequency of thoughts was not reduced at post treatment but believability of them was reduced) in studies of depression using behavioral interventions.
Reference: Zettle, R. D. & Hayes, S. C. (1986). Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior: The context
of reason giving. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 30 38.
This page includes behavioral measures used in laboratory-based studies.
The Center for Addictions, Personality, and Emotion Research has several computerized behavioral measures available for download including the PASAT-C (a distressing math task) and the mirror tracing task. You can access these programs by clicking here.
This page contains a working list of child and adolescent specific measures related to ACT processes.
The AFQ was derived from an initial pool of 50 items developed to measure psychological acceptance, conceptualized as an active and multidimensional process involving high or low levels of: willingness to experience private events, values-oriented action, experiential avoidance, and cognitive and emotional fusion. Results of exploratory factor analysis on these initial 50 items supported a three-factor solution. Factor one consisted of 25 items, all negatively worded. Conceptually, this factor seems to tap into experiential avoidance and fusion and is now the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y).
We have used the AFQ with children and adolescents 9-17 years old. Based on results from school studies in middle Tennessee, children report good comprehension of items. The AFQ seems to be a stronger predictor of negative outcomes such as physical and emotional symptoms.
The Children's Acceptance and Mindfulness Measure (CAMM; Greco, Smith, & Baer, 2009) is a 10-item measure of acceptance and mindfulness for youth.
Manuscript currently in progress.
For more information, contact Laurie Greco.
"Authors: L. A. Greco & Hart
The Diabetes Acceptance and Action Scale for Children and Adolescents is a 42-item measure that is being used to indicate levels of psychological flexibility in youth with Type 1 diabetes.
Scoring: To score the DAAS, first reverse score negatively worded items (see below), then sum all items. Higher scores on the DAAS should reflect higher levels of diabetes-related acceptance and action.
Reverse score key: 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42.
The authors are still in the process of collecting data. Preliminary data obtained thus far reveals statistically significant correlations:
Diabetes-related quality of life = .36 (higher acceptance correlates with higher Quality of Life)
Diabetes-related worry = -.41
Social anxiety = -.36
Adherence to medical regimen = .30"
Information quoted from Ciarrochi, J. & Bilich, L. (2006). Process measures of potential relevance to ACT. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wollongong, Australia.
The Parental Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (PAAQ) is a specific AAQ measure designed to assess experiential avoidance in the context of parenting.
Reference:
Cheron, D.M., Ehrenreich, J.T. & Pincus, D.B. (In Press). Assessment of parental experiential avoidance in a clinical sample of children with anxiety disorders. Child Psychiatry and Human Development.
The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y; Greco, Murrell, & Coyne, 2005) is a 17-item measure that asks respondents to rate how true each item is for them (0 = Not at All True; 4 = Very True). Items are tied to ACT’s model of human suffering and were generated to represent a theoretically cohesive conceptualization of psychological inflexibility fostered by: (1) Cognitive fusion (e.g., “My thoughts and feelings mess up my life,” “The bad things I think about myself must be true”); (2) Experiential avoidance (e.g., “I push away thoughts and feelings that I don’t like”); and (3) Inaction or behavioral ineffectiveness in the presence of unwanted internal experiences (e.g., “I can’t be a good friend when I feel upset”).
Consistent with the theory underlying acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), items converged into a 17-item scale (AFQ-Y) and an 8-item short form (AFQ-Y8). Results of classical test theory, factor analysis, and item response theory support the psychometric properties of the 17-item version of the AFQ-Y and AFQ-Y8. Overall, research suggests that the AFQ-Y may be a useful and child-friendly measure of core ACT processes.
Reference
Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment. 20(2), 93-102.
In this page I have uploaded a series of computerized measures that I have written in Visual Basic for Applications and used in a few studies. One of these measures, the Deictic Relational Task is a deictic framing measure that captures both deictic accuracy and fluency. We have been developing this measure over the last years with Michael Levin, Steven C. Hayes, Colin Stromberg and others.
There are many advantages to use Microsoft PowerPoint to write your computerized questionnaires and tasks. First of all, it is a highly disseminated software that I think most of you have. Secondly, it can potentially reduce acquiescence bias since you can change the background and format of each measure and you will be more likely to keep the participant's attention throughout.
The code of these slides (which you can find if you add the developer tab under options and click "visual basic") is freely available for modification and improvement as long as your intent is to benefit your clients, research and/or for enhancing the work of other scientist practitioners and researchers. Please, feel free to contact me if you find ways to improve the visual basic code or for questions about it. If you have questions about how to score the Deictic Relational Task or about how to compile all the measures together in a single PowerPoint document, let me know as well.
Note: make sure you enable macro before you try the measure (ex: Powerpoint Options/Trust Center/Trust Center Settings/Macro Settings/Enable all macros).
There are many measures of ACT concepts that have been developed for specific disorders, syndromes, and types of chronic disease.
Diabetes specific AAQ
Epilepsy specific AAQ
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties. The scale and additional information (scoring instructions and a brief summary of psychometric properties) are attached below.
Reference:
Lillis, J., & Hayes, S.C. (2008). Measuring avoidance and inflexibility in weight related problems. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4(4), 348-354.
Contact Jason Lillis for further information.
The Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS) assesses ACT processes in the context of cigarette smoking.
Reference:
Gifford, E. V., Antonuccio, D.O, Kohlenberg, B.S., Hayes, S.C., & Piasecki, M.M. (2002). Combining Bupropion SR with acceptance and commitment-based behavioral therapy for smoking cessation: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavioral Therapy, Reno, NV.
Sandoz, E. K., Wilson, K. G., & Merwin, R. M. (Under Revision). Assessment of Body Image Flexibility: The Body Image - Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.
Sandoz, E. K. (2010). Assessment of Body Image Flexibility: An Evaluation The Body Image - Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Unpublished dissertation. University of Mississippi.
Body image disturbance is when an individual’s experience of the physical self becomes problematic because of its inaccuracy, associated distress, and/or disruption of other areas of functioning. Emerging treatments for body image disturbance target the rigidity of cognitive and behavioral patterns, teaching individuals to become more open to and flexible with the experience. To evaluate this model of body image disturbance, it will be important to demonstrate not only positive outcomes, but the processes that account for these outcomes. Three studies were conducted in an attempt to develop a psychometrically sound measure of body image flexibility, the Body Image - Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (BI-AAQ). Study one focused on the generation and reduction of items for the BI-AAQ and a demonstration of its concurrent validity. Body image flexibility was shown to be associated with overall psychological flexibility, body image dissatisfaction, disordered eating, and other psychological and social difficulties. Study two demonstrated adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability of BI-AAQ. Study three replicated and extended the findings with respect to concurrent validity. Research and clinical utility of the BI-AAQ are discussed along with theoretical and treatment implications of the findings.
The BI-AAQ is linked below in .pdf format below and is downloadable for members. All items are reverse-scored to yield a score for body image acceptance.
Also linked below is a modified version of the BI-AAQ that does not refer specifically to weight and shape.
Finally, my complete dissertation manuscript which included all three psychometric studies is below. (I will replace this with the article manuscript as soon as it is updated.
Contact Emily Sandoz with questions, comments, or requests for the working manuscript: eksandoz@olemiss.edu
Chronic Pain version of the AAQ
Tinnitus specific AAQ.
Reference:
Westin, V., Hayes, S. C., & Andersson, G. (2008). Is it the sound or your relationship to it? The role of acceptance in predicting tinnitus impact. Behaviour Research and Therapy.
The Voices Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.
Reference: Shawyer, F., Ratcliff, K., Mackinnon, A., Farhall, J., Hayes, S.C. & Copolov, D. (2007). The voices acceptance and action scale (VAAS): Pilot data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(6), 593–606.
Partial list of fusion measures.
Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - believability subscale.
See the ATQ page on this site for more information.
In the United Kingdom, ACT researchers and clinicians have been collaborating on a general measure of fusion with thoughts. This has now been tested in three samples with a combined n of over 600. Access the attached PowerPoint presentation from Enschede for further information and background. You can also download the 13 and 28 item versions of the questionaire here.
CFQ Developers:
Maria Dempster, NHS Grampian
Helen Bolderston, Dorset Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
David Gillanders, University of Edinburgh
Frank Bond, Goldsmiths, University of London
The CFQ13 looks as though these are the best performing items, though this measure is still in development. Individuals interested in using this measure and adding to its evaluation are advised to continue to use the 28 item version, untill further studies confirm the CFQ13.
To collaborate with us do contact:
Helen Bolderston: helen.bolderston@dhft.nhs.uk
David Gillanders: david.gillanders@ed.ac.uk
Assesses believability of negative thoughts towards clients.
Reference: Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., Padilla, M., Kohlenberg, B. S., Fisher, G., Masuda, A., Pistorello, J., Rye, A. K., Berry, K. & Niccolls, R. (2004). The impact of acceptance and commitment training and multicultural training on the stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821-835.
Partial list of available mindfulness measures.
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire is a 39 item measure consisting of five subscales (observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience).
Reference:
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27-45.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15, 329-342.
The scale and measure development article are included below.
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is a 15 item measure assessing mindfulness of moment to moment experience.
Reference:
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale is a 20 item measure consisting of 2 sub-scales (acceptance and present moment awareness).
Reference:
Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: The Philadelphia mindfulness scale. Assessment, 15, 204-223.
This page is a working list of other measures related to ACT processes.
Reference: Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267-283.
Description from abstract of original paper:
"We developed a multidimensional coping inventory to assess the different ways in which people respond to stress. Five scales (of four items each) measure conceptually distinct aspects of problem-focused coping (active coping, planning, suppression of competing activities, restraint coping, seeking of instrumental social support); five scales measure aspects of what might be viewed as emotion-focused coping (seeking of emotional social support, positive reinterpretation, acceptance, denial, turning to religion); and three scales measure coping responses that arguably are less useful (focus on and venting of emotions, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement). Study 1 reports the development of scale items. Study 2 reports correlations between the various coping scales and several theoretically relevant personality measures in an effort to provide preliminary information about the inventory's convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 uses the inventory to assess coping responses among a group of undergraduates who were attempting to cope with a specific stressful episode. This study also allowed an initial examination of associations between dispositional and situational coping tendencies."
The EQ is a 20 item self-report scale designed to measure decentering and rumination.
Reference:
Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., van Dulmen, M., Segal, Z. V., Teasdale, J. D., Ma, H., & Williams, J. M. G. (2007). Initial psychometric properties of the Experiences Questionnaire: Validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behavior Therapy, 38, 234-246.
Please contact David Fresco (fresco@kent.edu) if you would like to receive a copy of the measure.
Internalized Shame Scale.
Reference:
Rosario, P.M. & White, R.M. (2006). The Internalized Shame Scale: Temporal stability, internal consistency, and principal components analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 95–103.
The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) assesses both avoidance of pain and cognitive fusion with pain.
Reference:
Wicksell, R. K., Renöfält, J., Olsson, G. L., Bond, F.W. & Melin, L. (2008). Avoidance and cognitive fusion - central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS). European Journal of Pain, 12, 491-500.
Scale for personality rigidity.
Reference: Rehfisch, J.M. (1958). A scale for personality rigidity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 11-15.
This scale has been found to relate to rule governed behavior in laboratory studies.
Wulfert, E., Greenway, D. E., Farkas, P., Hayes, S. C., & Dougher, M. J. (1994). Correlation between a personality test for rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659-671.
From abstract:
"Adults were selected on the basis of their scores on the Scale for Personality Rigidity (Rehfisch, 1958). Their scores served as a measure of hypothesized rule governance in the natural environment. Experiment 1 studied the effects of accurate versus minimal instructions and high versus low rigitidy on performance on a multiple differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) 4-s fixed-ratio (FR) 18 schedule. When the schedule was switched to extinction, accurate instructions and high rigidity were associated with greater perseveration in the response pattern subjects developed during the reinforcement phase. In Experiment 2, the effects of rigidity and of accurate versus inaccurate instructions were studied. Initially, all subjects received accurate instructions about an FR schedule. The schedule was then switched to DRL, but only half of the subjects received instructions about the DRL contingency, and the other half received FR instructions as before. Accurate instructions minimized individual differences because both high and low scorers on the rigidity scale earned points in DRL. However, when inaccurate instructions were provided, all high-rigidity subjects follow them although they did not earn points on the schedule, whereas most low-rigidity subjects abandoned them and responded appropriately to DRL. The experiments demonstrate a correlation between performances observed in the human operant laboratory and a paper-and-pencil test of rigidity that purportedly reflects important response styles that differentiate individuals in the natural environment. Implications for applied research and intervention are discussed."
Reference:
Neff, K. D. (2003). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223-250.
Coding Key:
Self-Kindness Items: 5, 12, 19, 23, 26
Self-Judgment Items: 1, 8, 11, 16, 21
Common Humanity Items: 3, 7, 10, 15
Isolation Items: 4, 13, 18, 25
Mindfulness Items: 9, 14, 17, 22
Over-identified Items: 2, 6, 20, 24
Subscale scores are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. To compute a total self-compassion score, reverse score the negative subscale items - self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification - then compute a total mean.
(This method of calculating the total score is slightly different than that used in the article referenced above, in which each subscale was added together. However, I find it is easier to interpret the scores if the total mean is used.)
The Thought Control Questionnaire assesses different methods used to control unwanted/aversive thoughts. The measure can be downloaded here.
Reference:
Wells, A., & Davies, M. I. (1994). The thought control questionnaire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 871–878.
"Authors: R. Michael Bagby, James D. A. Parker and Graeme J. Taylor
The TAS is a 20-item instrument that is one of the most commonly used measures of alexithymia. Alexithymia refers to people who have trouble identifying and describing emotions and who tend to minimise emotional experience and focus attention externally.
The TAS-20 has 3 subscales:
• Difficulty Describing Feelings subscale is used to measure difficulty describing emotions. 5 items – 2, 4, 7, 12, 17.
• Difficulty Identifying Feeling subscale is used to measure difficulty identifying emotions. 7 items – 1, 3, 6, 11, 9, 13, 14.
• Externally-Oriented Thinking subscale is used to measure the tendency of individuals to focus their attention externally. 8 items – 5, 8, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20.
Scoring: The TAS-20 is a self-report scale that is comprised of 20 items. Items are rated using a 5-point Likert scale whereby 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. There are 5 items that are negatively keyed (items 4, 5, 10, 18 and 19). The total alexithymia score is the sum of responses to all 20 items, while the score for each subscale factor is the sum of the responses to that subscale.
The TAS-20 uses cutoff scoring: equal to or less than 51 = non-alexithymia, equal to or greater than 61 = alexithymia. Scores of 52 to 60 = possible alexithymia.
Reliability: Demonstrates good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .81) and test-retest reliability (.77, p<.01).
Validity: Research using the TAS-20 demonstrates adequate levels of convergent and concurrent validity. The 3 factor structure was found to be theoretically congruent with the alexithymia construct. In addition, it has been found to be stable and replicable across clinical and nonclinical populations.
Reference:
Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A. & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23-32."
Information quoted from Ciarrochi, J. & Bilich, L. (2006). Process measures of potential relevance to ACT. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wollongong, Australia.
"Authors: Daniel M. Wegner & Sophia Zanakos
The WBSI is a 15-item questionnaire that is designed to measure thought suppression. Chronic thoughts suppression is a variable that is related to obsessive thinking and negative affect associated with depression and anxiety. The WBSI can help to identify individuals who are more prone to develop chronic thought suppression as well as individuals who express wishing they were not depressed, but are in fact depressed. The measure can also be used by practitioners to evaluate changer over time.
Scoring: The scoring of the WBSI is based on a 5 point scale from Strongly disagree (1) to Strongly agree (5). The total score is obtained by summing up the responses that are provided by respondents. The total score can range from 15 to 75. Higher scores on the WBSI indicate greater tendencies to suppress thoughts.
Reliability: The WBSI has very good internal consistency, with alphas ranging from .87 to .89. The WBSI has also been found to have good stability with a 1 week test-retest correlation of .92, and a 3 week to 3 month test-retest correlation of .69.
Validity: Demonstrates excellent convergent validity with significant correlations between the WBSI and several measures including Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), the Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). It has also been found that the WBSI correlates negatively with repression, thus suggesting that the WBSI measures a characteristic that is different to traditional concepts of repression.
Reference:
Wegner, D. M. & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640."
Information quoted from Ciarrochi, J. & Bilich, L. (2006). Process measures of potential relevance to ACT. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wollongong, Australia.
Ciarrochi, J. & Bilich, L. (2006). Process measures of potential relevance to ACT. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wollongong, Australia.
This document contains a large collection of ACT-relevant measures
Attached, please find a copy of self-monitoring forms I use with a wide range of patients. I direct patients to monitor those self-care behaviors relevant to their treatment (hygiene, eating, going to sleep at reasonable hour, exercise, meditation/centering, alcohol use). There is ample room for adding other behaviors or to permit some journaling/notes. *I recently replaced the GIF formatted forms with forms converted to PDF format (using free PDF writer at www.gohtm.com).
This page includes links to research summaries that are posted throughout the website. Please contact the site administrator if there are additional references or resources not included that would fit in one of the posted lists.
Below is summarized existing ACT empirical articles and references related to substance abuse, gambling, and recovery. Please contribute by adding to it if you see that references are missing.
Gambling related references:
Dymond & Whelan (2007). Verbal relations and the behavior analysis of gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 19-20
Non empirical publications on substance abuse
Batten, S. V., DeViva, J. C., Santanello, A. P., Morris, L. J., Benson, P. R., & Mann, M. A. (2009). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders. In J. Blackledge, J. Ciarrochi, & F. Dean (Eds.), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Current Directions (pp. 311-328). Queensland, Australia: Australian Academic Press.
Heffner, M. & Eifert, G. (2003). Valued directions: Acceptance & Commitment Therapy in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 378-383.
Smout, M. (2008). Psychotherapy for Methamphetamine Dependence. Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia 2008: 429.http://www.dassa.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Methamphetamine_Treatment_Manual_FINAL.pdf
Wilson, K. G. & Byrd, M. R. (2004). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Substance Abuse and Dependence. In S. C. Hayes & K. Strosahl, (Eds.)A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pp. 153-184). New York: Springer Press. (preprint available from 1st author -- click on his name above.)
Wilson, K. G. & Hayes, S. C. (2000). Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: an analysis and application to drug abuse. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 25-43.
Wilson, K. G., Hayes, S. C., & Byrd, M. (2000). Exploring compatibilities between Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and 12-Step treatment for substance abuse. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 18, 209-234.
Substance abuse research
Batten, S. V., & Hayes, S. C. (2005). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in the Treatment of Comorbid Substance Abuse and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Case Study. Clinical Case Studies, 4(3), 246-262.
Brown, R. A., Palm, K. M., Strong, D. R., Lejuez, C. W., Kahler, C. W. Zvolensky, M. J., Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V. (2008). Development of an exposure- and ACT-based distress tolerance treatment for early lapse smokers: Rationale, program description, and preliminary findings. Behavior Modification, 32, 302-332.
Gifford, E. V., Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., Antonuccio, D. O., Piasecki, M. M.., Rasmussen-Hall, M. L., & Palm, K. M. (2004). Acceptance theory-based treatment for smoking cessation: An initial trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 689-705.
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K.G., Gifford, E.V., Bissett, R., Piasecki, M., Batten, S.V., Byrd, M., & Gregg, J. (2004). A preliminary trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance-abusing methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Behavior Therapy, 35, 667-688.
Luoma, J. B., Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K. & Rye, A. K. (2008). Reducing the self stigma of substance abuse through acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, manual development, and pilot outcomes. Addiction Research & Therapy, 16, 149-165.
Stotts, A. L., Masuda, A., & Wilson, K. G. (in press). Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in methadone dose reduction: Rationale, treatment description, and preliminary cases. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice.
Twohig, M. P., Shoenberger, D., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). A preliminary investigation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a treatment for marijuana dependence in adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40,619-632.
Tull, M., Schulzinger, D., Schmidt, N.B., Zvolensky, M.J., Lejuez, C. W. (2007). Development and initial examination of a brief intervention for heightened anxiety sensitivity among heroin users. Behavior Modification, 31, 220-242.
A number of studies have been conducted examining the impact of small, ACT-based interventions in lab-based settings. This page includes a list of studies with available intervention scripts or sections of articles that specifically state how the intervention was conducted. In addition, it includes scripts for studies that have not yet been completed in order to provide additional examples of the interventions that are being tested. These scripts can help inform the design of future component/micro studies as well as provide a resource for those reviewing these studies.
If there are any additional study intervention scripts that are not listed here, you can add it by creating a new page using the instructions below.
To Add Content
1. Log in to your ACBS member account (you cannot create content as a guest).
2. Find your way to this parent page.
3. Click [add child page] at bottom.
4. Provide a concise, descriptive title.
5. Either attach a text file or a link to the content.
6. Remember to click [save].
This is a modified list of features that Dermot Barnes-Holmes presented at the first ACT Summer Institute in Reno in 2003. I (SCH) have added a few things as well
A List of Features that ACT Micro-Component Studies and Experimental Analogs of ACT Processes Should Contain
Here is a list of features that we consider to be essential for conducting top quality experimental research that is designed to model and test ACT processes in analog or micro-component research. There are almost certainly others and the relative emphasis that is placed on each one will vary as a function of the research question and overall design of the study.
1. The experimenter should be blind to the intervention applied to each participant (or the procedure automated; see below).
2. The experimental conditions must balance as much as possible for all relevant attribute variables (e.g., gender, psychopathology, unless the attribute(s) is the target of the analysis).
3. The experimenter should not be personally familiar with the participants and if they are, familiarity should be balanced across conditions.
4. The different interventions should be balanced in all possible ways, except for the critical difference you are seeking to manipulate (e.g., they should be the same length; they require similar levels of engagement with the material; if exercises are used that are appropriate for both conditions, they should be used in both; working should be matched where possible; method of delivery should be identical; etc).
5. The interventions should connect directly to the experimental challenge. In a pain tolerance study, for example, each of the interventions should focus on pain not anxiety or anger etc. (unless different foci are the target of the study).
6. Points 4 and 5 should be checked and supported by independent raters.
7. Where possible and appropriate, the procedure should involve requiring participants to articulate in their own words the intervention strategy that is being provided. Ideally this should be done at regular points throughout the intervention.
8. The verbal material produced under point 7 should be checked by independent raters to determine that participant “understanding” did not differ significantly across conditions, and to ensure that the manipulation successfully altered the intended behavioral process.
9. Participants should be reminded briefly of the relevant intervention strategy before the presentation of each physical or psychological challenge (e.g., CO2 inhalation, electric shock delivery, emotionally aversive pictures or video clips, spider BAT, etc).
10. Ideally, the entire procedure, including pre-intervention baseline, intervention, and post-intervention tasks should be automated. For example, the intervention could be presented via audio or video clips and these can then be checked by independent raters. Moreover, others can then take your automated procedure and attempt to replicate in a different lab. If automation is not possible, then every session should be videotaped to check for fidelity. If only some sessions are videotaped, then the experimenter should not know which ones are being taped.
11. All participants should be asked to summarize at the very end of the experiment the strategy they employed during the study so that these can be checked by independent raters.
12. Other questions of relevance should also be asked that might alter the interpretation of results. For example the participant might be asked to rate the likability or believability of the experimenter (including any video- or audio-based material), expectations for performance on the task, relevance of intervention to "real life", etc.
13. Ideally, some form of standardized self-report or other instrument should be developed to measure the extent to which participants understand and apply specific strategies.
14. For ACT / RFT studies the design of the protocols should be tied clearly to RFT concepts. Studies should not just grab a metaphor or exercise without working through how the metaphor/exercise is predicted, theoretically, to influence the participants’ responses in your study.
15. If the study is a group design it should be adequately powered to test the key hypotheses, especially if null results are to be meaningful. For example, if an interaction is possible, each individual cell size must have a large enough N to test that interaction at an adequate level (say, power of .8 assuming a sensible effect size)
16. If mediational analyses are important, the study must be powered to test these analyses.
17. Especially if null results are predicted, make sure the actual measurement characteristics, outliers, and similar
issues do not undermine the calculated power.
18. Meta-analyses of ACT micro-component studies show that in general, rationale-alone interventions are weak (and without the controls specified above they are often difficult to interpret because it is not known what participants actually did in response to the rationale). If the purpose is to examine ACT components, consider including more active and experiential elements.
19. If testing multiple ACT components, consider how to assess for changes in multiple ACT processes and whether comparison conditions should tease apart the impact of individual components.
Attached you will find a series of components (e.g., video, visual basic programs, instructions, etc.) used in ACT micro studies examining the role of values in performance during a cold-pressor pain tolerance task. The study from which these components come is not yet published but many similar studies have used these components in the Barnes-Holmes laboratory at NUI-Maynooth. We hope that they will prove useful to you in developing your own studies. They have been uploaded to the site as compressed zip files but they should be able to be opened easily as their individual files once downloaded.
We are in the process of testing the effects of a self-as-context intervention on two measures of task persistence (breath holding and a difficult math task). We used an active control condition involving the same metaphor and exercise, but emphasizing self-as-content and emotion control strategies throughout. The results of the intervention will be analyzed soon and included on this page.
We would really appreciate any feedback regarding the intervention scripts. If you have any comments or suggestions please contact Mike Levin at levinm2@gmail.com.
Data to be presented at
Levin, M., Waltz, T.J., Yadavaia, J.E. & Hayes, S.C. (2008). Examining the effect of a self as context intervention on multiple measures of task persistence. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Chicago, IL.
We are currently testing the effects of a brief values intervention on study behavior with college students. The intervention includes a week of self monitoring and is being compared to self monitoring alone without the values intervention. The study is being conducted by Jennifer Plumb, Michael Levin, Kate Morrison and Steven Hayes.
The values condition protocol script is included below. We would really appreciate any feedback regarding the intervention scripts. If you have any comments or suggestions please contact Jen Plumb at jcplumb@gmail.com.
Campell-Sills, L., Barlow, B.H., Brown, T.A. & Hofmann, S.G. (2006). Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1251-1263.
Abstract
The present investigation compared the subjective and physiological effects of emotional suppression and acceptance in a sample of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. Sixty participants diagnosed with anxiety and mood disorders were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group listened to a rationale for suppressing emotions, and the other group listened to a rationale for accepting emotions. Participants then watched an emotion-provoking film and applied the instructions. Subjective distress, heart rate, skin conductance level, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia were measured before, during, and after the film. Although both groups reported similar levels of subjective distress during the film, the acceptance group displayed less negative affect during the post-film recovery period. Furthermore, the suppression group showed increased heart rate and the acceptance group decreased heart rate in response to the film. There were no differences between the two groups in skin conductance or respiratory sinus arrhythmia. These findings are discussed in the context of the existing body of research on emotion regulation and current treatment approaches for anxiety and mood disorders.
Protocol included below
Eifert, G. H. & Heffner, M. (2003). The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 293-312.
Abstract
The present study compared the effects of creating an acceptance versus a control treatment context on the avoidance of aversive interoceptive stimulation. Sixty high anxiety sensitive females were exposed to two 10-min periods of 10% carbon dioxide enriched air, an anxiogenic stimulus. Before each inhalation period, participants underwent a training procedure aimed at encouraging them either to mindfully observe (acceptance context) or to control symptoms via diaphragmatic breathing (control context). A third group was given no particular training or instructions. We hypothesized that an acceptance rather than control context would be more useful in the reduction of anxious avoidance. Compared to control context and no-instruction participants, acceptance context participants were less avoidant behaviorally and reported less intense fear and cognitive symptoms and fewer catastrophic thoughts during the CO2 inhalations. We discuss the implications of our findings for an acceptance-focused vs. control-focused context when conducting clinical interventions for panic and other anxiety disorders.
The intervention protocol is included below quoted from Heffner (2000).
Feldner, M. T., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., & Spira, A. P. (2003). Emotional avoidance: An experimental tests of individual differences and response suppression during biological challenge. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 403-411.
Abstract
The present study examined the affective consequences of response inhibition during a state of anxietyrelated physical stress. Forty-eight non-clinical participants were selected on the basis of pre-experimental differences in emotional avoidance (high versus low) and subjected to four inhalations of 20% carbon dioxide-enriched air. Half of the participants were instructed to inhibit the challenge-induced aversive emotional state, whereas the other half was instructed to simply observe their emotional response. Participants high in emotional avoidance compared to those low in emotional avoidance responded with greater levels of anxiety and affective distress but not physiological arousal. Individuals high in emotional avoidance also reported greater levels of anxiety relative to the low emotional avoidance group when suppressing compared to observing bodily sensations. These findings are discussed in terms of the significance of emotional avoidance processes during physical stress, with implications for better understanding the nature of panic disorder.
The intervention protocol is included below quoted from Feldner (2003).
Forman, E.M., Hoffman, K.L., McGrath, K.B., Herbert, J.D., Brandsma, L.L. & Lowe, M.R. (2007). A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2372-2386.
Abstract
The present study utilized an analog paradigm to investigate the effectiveness of two strategies for coping with food cravings, which was theorized to be critical to the maintenance of weight loss. Ninety-eight undergraduate students were given transparent boxes of chocolate Hershey’s Kisses and instructed to keep the chocolates with them, but not to eat them, for 48 h. Before receiving the Kisses, participants were randomized to receive either (a) no intervention, (b) instruction in control-based coping strategies such as distraction and cognitive restructuring, or (c) instruction in acceptance-based strategies such as experiential acceptance and defusion techniques. Measures included the Power of Food Scale (PFS; a measure of psychological sensitivity to the food environment), self-report ratings of chocolate cravings and surreptitiously recorded chocolate consumption. Results suggested that the effect of the intervention depended on baseline PFS levels, such that acceptance-based strategies were associated with better outcomes (cravings, consumption) among those reporting the highest susceptibility to the presence of food, but greater cravings among those who scored lowest on the PFS. It was observed that craving self-report measures predicted chocolate consumption, and baseline PFS levels predicted both cravings and consumption. Results are discussed in terms of the implications for weight loss maintenance strategies.
Protocol included below
Gutierrez, O., Luciano, M. C., Rodríguez. M., & Fink. B. (2004). Comparison between an Acceptance-based and a Cognitive-Control-Based Protocol for coping with pain. Behavior Therapy, 35, 767-783.
Abstract
This study compares specific acceptance-based strategies and cognitive-control-based strategies for coping with experimentally induced pain. Forty participants were randomly assigned to an acceptance-based protocol (ACT), the goal of which was to disconnect pain-related thoughts and feelings from literal actions, or to a control-based protocol (CONT) that focused on changing or controlling pain-related thoughts and feelings. Participants took part in a nonsense-syllables-matching task that involved successive exposures to increasingly painful shocks. In both conditions, the task involved an overall value-oriented context that encouraged the participants to continue with the task despite the exposure to pain. At times throughout the task, participants were asked to choose to continue with the task and be shocked or stop the task and avoid being shocked. Each choice had specific costs and benefits. Participants performed the task twice, both before and after receiving the assigned experimental protocol. Two measures were obtained at pre- and post-intervention: tolerance of the shocks and self-reports of pain. ACT participants showed significantly higher tolerance to pain and lower believability of experienced pain compared to the CONT condition. Conceptual and clinical implications are discussed.
Protocol included below
Kehoe, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Cochrane, A. & Stewart, I. (2007). Breaking the pain barrier: Understanding and treating human suffering. The Irish Psychologist, 33(11), 288-297.
This article (see link above to download) describes the intervention components in detail starting on page 292.
Keogh, E., Bond, F. W., Hanmer, R. & Tilston, J. (2005). Comparing acceptance and control-based coping instructions on the cold-pressor pain experiences of healthy men and women. European Journal of Pain, 9, 591-598.
Abstract
The current study reflects recent developments in psychotherapy by examining the effect of acceptance-based coping instructions, when compared to the opposite, more control/distraction-based instructions, on cold-pressor pain. Since previous research indicates gender differences in how people cope with pain, we also sought to determine whether differences would be found between healthy men and women. As predicted, results indicated that women reported lower pain threshold and tolerance level than did men. Furthermore, the acceptance-based instruction resulted in lower sensory pain reports when compared to the opposite instructions. Finally, for affective pain, acceptance instructions only benefited women. These results suggest that acceptance-based coping may be particular useful in moderating the way in which individuals, especially women, cope with pain.
The intervention protocol is included below quoted from Keogh et al. (2005).
Levitt, J. T., Brown, T. A., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35, 747-766.
Abstract
The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion were examined in 60 patients with panic disorder. Prior to undergoing a 15-minute 5.5% carbon dioxide challenge, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: a 10-minute audiotape describing 1 of 2 emotion-regulation strategies (acceptance or suppression) or a neutral narrative (control group). The acceptance group was significantly less anxious and less avoidant than the suppression or control groups in terms of subjective anxiety and willingness to participate in a second challenge, but not in terms of self-report panic symptoms or physiological measures. No differences were found between suppression and control groups on any measures. Use of suppression was related to more subjective anxiety during the challenge, and use of acceptance was related to more willingness to participate in a second challenge. The results suggest that acceptance may be a useful intervention for reducing subjective anxiety and avoidance in patients with panic disorder.
Protocol included below
Masedo, A.I. & Esteve, M.R. (2007). Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 199-209.
Abstract
Wegner’s Theory of Ironic Processes has been applied to study the effects of cognitive strategies to control pain. Research suggests that suppression contributes to a more distressing pain experience. Recently, the acceptance-based approach has been proposed as an alternative to cognitive control. This study assessed the tolerance time, the distress and the perceived pain intensity in three groups (suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping groups) when the participants were exposed to a cold pressor procedure. Two hundred and nineteen undergraduates volunteered to participate. The suppression group showed the shortest tolerance time and the acceptance group showed the longest tolerance time. The acceptance group showed pain and distress immersion ratings that were significantly lower than in the other two groups, between which the differences were not significant. In the first recovery period, the suppression group showed pain and distress ratings that were higher than in the other two groups. In the second recovery period, although the acceptance group showed pain and distress ratings that were significantly lower than in the other two groups, the suppression and the spontaneous coping groups did not differ. The presence of a ‘rebound’ of physical discomfort and the effects of suppression on behavioural avoidance are discussed. These results support the acceptance approach in the management of pain.
The full intervention protocol is included below in Spanish as well as a quoted section from the article describing the intervention in English.
Páez-Blarrina M., Luciano C., Gutiérrez-Martínez O, Valdivia S., Ortega J. and Rodríguez-Valverde M. (2008). The role of values with personal examples in altering the functions of pain: Comparison between acceptance-based and cognitive-control-based protocols. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46 , 84-97.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was twofold. First, to compare the effect of establishing a motivational context of values on pain tolerance, believability, and reported pain, with three experimental conditions: pain acceptance (ACT condition), pain control (CONT condition), or no values (untrained condition). Second, the study aimed to isolate the impact of adding the corresponding coping strategies to both the ACT and the CONT conditions. Thirty adults were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental conditions. The participants went through the pain task in two occasions (Test I and Test II). In Test I, the effects of the ACT-values protocol (which established pain as part of valued action), the CONT-values protocol (which established high pain as opposed to valued action), and the no-values protocol, were compared. In Test II, the effect of adding the corresponding coping strategy to each condition (defusion for ACT vs. suppression for CONT) was examined. Test I showed a clear superiority of the ACT-values protocol in increasing tolerance and lowering pain believability. In Test II, the superiority of the ACT protocol was replicated, while the CONT protocol proved useful to reduce reported pain, in accordance with previous studies.
Protocol included below
Roche, B., Forsyth, J.P. & Maher, E. (2007). The impact of demand characteristics on brief acceptance- and control-based interventions for pain tolerance. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14, 381-393.
Abstract
The present analog study compared the effectiveness of an acceptance- and control-based intervention on pain tolerance using a cold pressor task, and is a partial replication and extension of the Hayes, Bissett et al. (Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R.T., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I. S., Cooper, L. D., & Grundt, A. M. (1999). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49, 33-47) study. Our aim was to test the effects of a nonspecific source of therapeutic change within the context of ACT therapy. Otherwise healthy undergraduates (N=20) were exposed to a cold pressor task before, immediately after, and 10 min following one of the two interventions. Half of the participants also were assigned to a high demand characteristic condition in which the experimenter maintained close physical proximity, eye contact, and placed subtle social pressure on participants to please the experimenter. The results showed that the most important factor influencing latency to withstand the cold pressor task was social pressure. The acceptance-based intervention was more subject to demand than the control strategy. Evaluative ratings of pain were unaffected by the demand manipulation. The current data suggest that demand characteristics can exert a significant positive impact on the outcome of therapeutic protocols. The implications of this view for acceptance- and control-based psychosocial interventions are discussed.
Intervention script quoted from article below
Vowles, K., McNeil, D.W., Bates, M., Gallimore, P. & McCall, C. (2007). Effects of pain acceptance and pain control strategies on physical impairment in individuals with chronic low back pain. Behavior Therapy, 38, 412-425.
Abstract
Psychosocial treatments for chronic pain are effective. There is a need, however, to understand the processes involved in determining how these treatments contribute to behavior change. Control and acceptance strategies represent two potentially important processes involved in treatment, although they differ significantly in approach. Results from laboratory-based studies suggest that acceptance-oriented strategies significantly enhance pain tolerance and behavioral persistence, compared with control-oriented strategies. There is a need, however, to investigate processes of acceptance and control directly in clinical settings. The present study investigated the effects of three brief instructional sets (pain control, pain acceptance, continued practice) on demonstrated physical impairment in 74 individuals with chronic low back pain using an analogue experimental design. After controlling for baseline performance, the pain acceptance group demonstrated greater overall functioning on a set of 7 standardized physical tasks relative to the other two groups, which did not differ from one another. Further, the acceptance group exhibited a 16.3% improvement in impairment, whereas the pain control group worsened by 8.3% and the continued practice group improved by 2.5%. These results suggest that acceptance may be a key process involved in behavior change in individuals with chronic pain.
Protocol included below
Here are just a few of the studies on ACT done in groups (some of these also have individual sessions, but all have groups as a substantial part of the intervention):
Bond, F. W. & Bunce, D. (2000). Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 156-163.
Zettle, R. D., & Raines, J. C. (1989). Group cognitive and contextual therapies in treatment of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45,438-445.
Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., Padilla, M., Kohlenberg, B. S., Fisher, G., Masuda, A., Pistorello, J., Rye, A. K., Berry, K. & Niccolls, R. (2004). The impact of acceptance and commitment training and multicultural training on the stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821-835.
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Bissett, R., Piasecki, M., Batten, S. V., Byrd, M., & Gregg, J. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance abusing methadone maintained opiate addicts. Behavior Therapy, 35, 667-688.
Gifford, E. V., Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., Antonuccio, D. O., Piasecki, M. M.., Rasmussen-Hall, M. L., & Palm, K. M. (2004). Acceptance theory-based treatment for smoking cessation: An initial trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 689-705.
McCracken, L. M, Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2005). Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long-standing chronic pain: A preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1335-1346.
Gratz, K. L. & Gunderson, J. G. (in press). Preliminary data on an acceptance-based emotion regulation group intervention for deliberate self-harm among women with Borderline Personality Disorder. Behavior Therapy.
Blackledge, J. T. & Hayes, S. C. (2006). Using Acceptance and Commitment Training in the support of parents of children diagnosed with autism. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 28 (1), 1-18.
Lundgren, A. T., Dahl, J., Melin, L. & Kees, B. (in press). Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for drug refractory epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial in South Africa. Epilepsia.
Most of these studies are in the publications area of the site (and if one is missing prompt the author to get it up there).
The file at the bottom of the page (the ACT handout) lists most ACT publications as of Summer 2009.
As healthcare delivery continues to move towards and integrated care model, the connections between biological, psychological, and social processes affecting health remain minimally understood. Researchers have been exploring the role of acceptance, mindfulness, and values in producing positive health outcomes, while examining the negative role of experiential avoidance in the development and maintenance of health problems. ACT studies have been conducted in the areas of chronic pain, smoking, stress, burnout, diabetes management, and epilepsy with more studies in progress. In this section you will find links to researchers, studies, and applications of ACT in the areas of Wellness, Behavioral Health, Health Psychology, and Behavioral Medicine.
A number of researchers are working on weight control issues from an ACT/ RFT perspective. Here is where you will find the relevant research and conceptual issues.
From an ACT perspective, many of the psychological factors related to weight control that were discussed previously can be grouped into three categories:
Persistence: Individuals who have difficulty maintaining weight loss typically report or have been found to eat in response to stress and other negative affective states, such as hopelessness, helplessness, anger, anxiety, or boredom. From an ACT perspective, this can be seen as a problem with persistence or distress tolerance. The ACT theory of psychopathology suggests that attempts to change or eliminate unwanted private experiences (experiential avoidance) result in a narrow set of behavioral responses. In this case, the presence of uncomfortable or undesirable emotions consistently occasions eating for comfort. The problem is that the short-term effects of reducing negative affect have little or no impact on an individual’s long-term ability to face discomfort and lead a healthy, vital life. Each instance strengthens the relationship between uncomfortable emotion and avoidance. In a sense, the individual becomes less able to deal with uncomfortable emotions over time and eating is required more and more as a coping response.
Rigidity: Individuals who have difficulty maintaining weight loss typically report or have been found to adhere to rigid thinking patterns and rigid control of eating behaviors. Unsuccessful maintainers frequently adhere to dichotomous “all or nothing” thinking, viewing a minor misstep as a total failure or discounting any gains that fall short of some imagined ideal as meaningless. These individuals are prone to alternating between total restriction of desirable foods and a complete lack of weight controls all together. From and ACT perspective, this can be viewed as cognitive fusion. Cognitive fusion refers to situations in which behavior is excessively regulated by verbal rules and is insensitive to direct experiences. Individuals may be responding to verbal formulations, such as, “I had cake therefore I blew it, so what’s the point” or, “I only lost 15 pounds. I’ll never get to where I want to be.” These private events are experienced as literal truth, not as experiences that can be noticed while not being believed nor disbelieved. Individuals respond as though this is a true state of affairs and engage in behaviors that are inconsistent with a healthy, vital life.
Motivational factors: Individuals who have difficulty maintaining weight loss typically report attempting to lose weight in response to pressure from friends, family members, or health professionals as opposed to personal reasons, such as caring for oneself, wanting to be more healthy, or less activity restriction. From an ACT perspective, this can be seen as a form of rule-governance called pliance. Pliance occurs when individuals engage in behaviors in an attempt to please others or “be good” (Hayes, Strosahl et al., 1999). When this function dominates over direct, personal experiences of what works, problems can occur. These externally based contingencies are often not enough to maintain behavior outside the presence of the contextual variables (e.g. family member telling them they are doing a good job). Given the lifelong nature of maintaining weight, it is unlikely that excessive pliance could be a successful long-term behavioral approach. From an ACT perspective, individuals do not need to engage in behaviors consistent with weight maintenance in order to be praised by others; they can do them as an expression of chosen personal values (also called augmenting) and doing what works in regard to those values (also called tracking). In this respect, weight maintenance behaviors are less rigid and are more likely to be tied to the direct contingencies necessary for success.
Motivation, then, can be viewed primarily as a values issue. People are often not connected to their values. It is possible that there is frequently a disparity between what people want in their lives and what they are actually doing. This disparity can be painful to contact, thus relegating the issue of values to the background. Acceptance and defusion can help create a context where this disparity can be noticed without attachment to the painful private events that can accompany this connection. From an ACT perspective, then, values work involves goal setting/ attainment and the willingness to say/ know what is truly wanted. This involves the ability to recognize and be in contact with the disparity between what is desired and what is currently being done.
Outcome Studies: Weight Maintenance
Micro/Component Studies: Weight Maintenance Outcome Studies: Weight Maintenance
Micro/Component Studies: Weight Maintenance
98 participants with chocolate cravings were exposed to a CBT-based protocol and an ACT-based protocol or no instructions and required to carry chocolate with them of for two days. Those more impacted by food related cues ate less and had fewer cravings in the ACT condition.
Measurement Development: Weight Maintenance
The ability to cope with stress has been associated with weight maintenance. Individuals who were described as having poor coping skills, or a poor ability to manage internal or external demands that are appraised as stressful, have been show to regain weight when confronted with stressful life events (S. Byrne, Cooper, & Fairburn, 2003; Gormally & Rardin, 1981; Gormally, Rardin, & Black, 1980; Grilo, Shiffman, & Wing, 1989).
People who regain lost weight tend to eat in response to the presence of negative emotional states or use food to regulate their mood; a phenomenon often referred to as emotional eating (S. Byrne et al., 2003; Ganley, 1989). Obese people who have difficulty losing or keeping off weight have been shown to use food as a source of comfort and satisfaction (Castelnuovo-Tedesco & Schiebel, 1975), eat after difficult interpersonal situations (Hockley, 1979), and eat in response to hopelessness, helplessness, anger, anxiety, or boredom (Hudson & Williams, 1981; Rotmann & Becker, 1970).
Motivational factors have also been associated with weight maintenance. Successful weight maintainers have been found to be motivated to lose weight for more personal reasons as opposed to pressures from family, friends, or medical professionals (Ogden, 2000). It appears that when a person is intrinsically motivated, and weight loss is tied to meaningful outcomes other than just losing weight, patients tend to be more successful in keeping weight off.
Self-efficacy has been also been associated with weight maintenance. Self-efficacy can be described as a belief in one’s capability to produce desired outcomes in one’s life. Related, individuals who respond to overeating episodes passively tend to regain weight more than those who respond actively (Jeffery et al., 1984). The key difference seems to be that active responders somehow do not get stuck when confronted with adversity.
Rigid versus flexible control of eating behavior has been associated with weight regain. Rigid control is characterized by dichotomous ‘all or nothing’ thinking and alternating periods of severe restriction and no weight control efforts. Flexible control is characterized by a ‘more or less’ approach, a long-term outlook, and the inclusion of desired foods at moderate amounts (Westenhoefer, 2001).
Despite the literature findings, potentially important psychological variables are rarely targeted in clinical trials of comprehensive weight loss programs or program components. Many interventions lack a psychological component altogether (for a review, see Avenell et al., 2004).
Obesity has been referred to as a dangerous epidemic and one of the most important public health challenges of the 21st century. The sharp increase in obesity has contributed to increases in related conditions, causing a sizeable economic cost burden for health providers and funding agencies. The 2002 estimated U.S. cost burden for obesity was $92.6 billion (Finkelstein, Fiebelkorn, & Wang, 2003).
It has been shown that marketplace food portions have increased in size since the 1970’s(Young & Nestle, 2002). People have been eating out more (K. Ball, Brown, & Crawford, 2002), food industry marketing has increased, and larger numbers of new products are being introduced (Gallo, 1990). Most Americans are sedentary. Technological advances have led to an increase in use of computers, cars, elevators, and televisions, with subsequent decreases in athletic activities including walking and bicycling.
Obese people also face discrimination resulting in external consequences. A recent review of the literature found evidence of obesity discrimination at every stage of the employment cycle (Roehling, 1999). Negative attitudes regarding obesity are widespread, socially acceptable, and develop as early as three years of age (Falkner et al., 1999; Puhl & Brownell, 2003a).
Well controlled, comprehensive weight loss programs often achieve substantial weight loss results with low rates of attrition. However weight maintenance has been a significant problem in the literature. Typically, half the weight lost is regained in the first year following treatment, and by 3-5 years posttreatment, 80% of patients have returned to or exceeded their pretreatment weight (Perri, 1998; Wadden et al., 1989; Wing, 1998).
The pages below list published ACT-related research studies for specific health problems that are available on the website as of July 2008. Empirical studies listed include ACT outcome studies, case studies, correlational research and micro/component studies. The literature is moving quickly and it takes a while to update pages like this. For a more detailed list of outcome studies and other empirical research you can download the "ACT Handout" and/or check the research summaries posted on the website, which are updated more regularly.
Outcome Studies: Coping with Cancer
Large randomized trial showing that ACT is more helpful than traditional CBT in dealing with end stage cancer and works through a different process. Amazing data.
Case Studies: Coping with Cancer
Outcome Studies: Chronic Pain
Included people (adults) with longstanding pain due to whiplash (WAD). A 10-session protocol was compared with a wait list control group, and found significant improvements following treatment in functioning and life satisfaction, as well as in psychological flexibility (as measured with PIPS).
Open trial with 14 adolescents. Good outcomes that continue to improve through follow up.
108 chronic pain patients with a long history of treatment are followed through an ACT-based 3-4 week residential treatment program. Measures improved from initial assessment to pre-treatment on average only 3% (average of 3.9 month wait), but improved on average 34% following treatment. 81% of these gains were retained through a 3 month follow up. Changes in acceptance predicted positive changes in depression, pain related anxiety, physical disability, psychosocial disability, and the ability to stand. Positive outcomes were also seen in a timed walk, decreased medical visits, daily rest due to pain, pain intensity, and decreased pain medication use.
A small randomized controlled trial shows that a four hour ACT intervention reduced sick day usage by 91% over the next six months compared to treatment as usual in a group of chronic pain patients at risk for going on to permanent disability.
Mediation Analyses
Case Studies: Chronic Pain
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of chronic pain and shows resulting data. Case study.
Micro/Component Studies: Chronic Pain
Correlational Studies: Chronic Pain
This study is based on a pain related early version of the AAQ. Greater acceptance of pain was associated with reports of lower pain intensity, less pain-related anxiety and avoidance, less depression, less physical and psychosocial disability, more daily uptime, and better work status. A relatively low correlation between acceptance and pain intensity showed that acceptance is not simply a function of having a low level of pain. Regression analyses showed that acceptance of pain predicted better adjustment on all other measures of patient function, independent of perceived pain intensity. This work is replicated, refined and extended in McCracken, L. M. & Eccleston, C. (2003). Coping or acceptance: What to do about chronic pain. Pain, 105, 197-204. and McCracken, L. M. , Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159-166.
Outcome Studies: Epilepsy
RCT with 27 drug resistant epileptics comparing 9 hours of ACT – individual and group -- to supportive therapy. Reduction of seizures to near zero level; maintenance for a year. Quality of life improves continuously through the follow up. Mediational analyses fit the ACT model and are described in more detail in Lundgren, T., Dahl, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2008). Evaluation of mediators of change in the treatment of epilepsy with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 31(3), 225-235.
Two small RCTs (N = 18; and N = 28) comparing a three session ACT protocol (two individual; one group) to two other conditions. As compared to yoga, significantly reduced seizures in the ACT condition; as compared to attention control, significantly reduced seizures and experiential avoidance, and significantly increased quality of life in the ACT condition at a one year follow up.
Outcome Studies: Diabetes Management
RCT showing that ACT + patient education is significantly better than patient education alone in producing good self-management and better blood glucose levels in lower SES patients with Type II diabetes. Effects at follow up are mediated by changes in self-management and greater psychological flexibility with regard to diabetes related thoughts and feelings.
Outcome Studies: High-Risk Sexual Behavior
Components from ACT were included as component of a successful program to reduce high risk sexual behavior in adolescents.
Case Studies: Athletic Performance
Case study. An ACT protocol with an emphasis on mindfulness helps with sports outcomes.
Case Studies: Erectile Dysfunction
A successful application of ACT to a 30-year-old male with difficulties in accepting his bisexual orientation and with an erectile dysfunction is presented.
Outcome Studies: Smoking
6 acceptance and mindfulness group sessions during 35 days including individual homework assignments. 8 of 10 participants completed the program. At 1 mo follow up 50 percent (of 8 completers) were non-smokers, and the rest showed a decrease in smoking at a rate between 45 and 75 percent. Increase of the acceptance aspect of mindfulness was correlated with non-smoking.
Medium sized randomized controlled trial comparing ACT to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as a method of smoking cessation. Quit rates were similar at post but at a one-year follow-up the two groups differed significantly. The ACT group had maintained their gains (35% quit rates) while the NRT quit rates had fallen (less than 10%). Mediational analyses shows that ACT works through acceptance and response flexibility.
Outcome Studies: Stress and Burnout
Pre – post study shows that ACT workshop helps parents cope with the stress of raising autistic children.
As small study examining whether a group consultation including elements of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy improved adoption compared to a standard 1-day continuing education workshop on Group Drug Counseling (GDC). The group consultation appeared to result in greater adoption as well as greater sense of personal accomplishment ( a burnout subscale).
Pre – post study shows that ACT workshop helps parents cope with the stress of raising autistic children.
A medium sized randomized controlled trial that found that a one day ACT workshop produces greater decreases in stigmatization of clients by therapists and greater decreases in therapist burnout than an educational control and (or some comparisons) than multicultural training. Mediational analyses fit the model.
Randomized controlled trial. Shows that ACT is more effective than a previously empirically supported behavioral approach to reducing worksite stress and anxiety, and that both are better than a wait list control.
Correlational Studies: Stress and Burnout
Study compared experiential avoidance (as measures by the AAQ) and emotional intelligence in terms of their ability to predict general mental health, physical well-being, and job satisfaction in workers (controlling for the effects of job control since this work organisation variable is consistently associated with occupational health and performance). Results from 290 United Kingdom workers showed that emotional intelligence did not significantly predict any of the well-being outcomes, after accounting for acceptance and job control. Acceptance predicted general mental health and physical well-being but not job satisfaction, Job control was associated with job satisfaction, only. Not controlling one’s thoughts and feelings (as advocated by acceptance) may have greater benefits for mental well-being than attempting consciously to regulate them (as emotional intelligence suggests).
Shows that AAQ predicts positive work outcomes (mental health, satisfaction, performance) even one year later, especially in combination with job control. Re-factors the AAQ and shows that a two factor solution can work on a slightly different 16 item version.
Outcome Studies: Weight Maintenance
Micro/Component Studies: Weight Maintenance Outcome Studies: Weight Maintenance
Micro/Component Studies: Weight Maintenance
98 participants with chocolate cravings were exposed to a CBT-based protocol and an ACT-based protocol or no instructions and required to carry chocolate with them of for two days. Those more impacted by food related cues ate less and had fewer cravings in the ACT condition.
Measurement Development: Weight Maintenance
In order to publish clinical trials at a high-level, it is advisable to conduct some sort of treatment adherence procedure. This will help you and your readers see how adherent your therapists or intervention deliverers were to the manuals provided (even if you used a flexible protocol, it can illuminate how well the important processes were delivered). It is also good to include a measure of therapist/intervention deliverer competence. In many of the ACT clinical trials, researchers have assessed both.
It is virtually impossible to conduct high-quality treatment adherence and competence coding without a coding manual that describes, accurately and with sufficient detail, the constructs of interest that most individuals with sufficient training could understand.
In assessing fidelity to a treatment model, such as ACT, these can be difficult questions to develop. Therefore, we recommend utilizing manuals that have already been tested in other clinical trials. Even if some of the questions pertain to areas you did not cover in your treatment (e.g., a different presenting problem), the format of the response options and the wording of the questions can still be very helpful as you modify some of the content you will assess.
Consistent with recommendations in the literature, we recommend the following:
Click on the child pages below for sample treatment adherence and competence materials that have been used in ACT studies.
Here are the adherence manuals used in the NIMH-funded randomized trial of ACT vs. PRT (Progressive Relaxation Training) for the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (Investigators: Michael Twohig & Steven Hayes).
Twohig, M.P., Hayes, S.C., Plumb, J.C., Pruitt, L.D., Collins, A.B., Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Woidneck, M.R. (2010). A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy vs progressive relaxation training in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Manuscript under review.
For questions about the use of the ACT manual, please contact Jen Plumb. For questions regarding the use of the PRT manual, please contact Holly Hazlett-Stevens at the University of Nevada Reno.
Below you will find the manual used in the NIDA-funded smoking cessation study conducted at the University of Nevada Reno.
Please contact Heather Pierson for additional information about this manual.
This manual was adapted by Stephanie H. Best, MA from a line of adherence manuals used in various ACT and other studies.
The manual below is being used in a NIMH-funded study to prevent mental health issues in college students.
It was modified by Steve Hayes.
ACT has been coming under fire from various wings of CBT, e.g.,
The relation of ACT to CBT was discussed in the earliest ACT writings. e.g.,
And these more specific criticisms are gradually being answered, e.g.,
In the 1980’s Steve Hayes and colleagues did a series of studies which found that cognitive and social learning methods did not work via processes described by these theories. e.g.,
ACT followed a whole set of studies that showed that cognitive methods worked because of contextual factors
There is a growing set of empirical articles comparing ACT with traditional BT and CBT methods. All have shown differences at the level of process, and some in outcome.
Randomized controlled study in which 14 student therapists treat one client each from an ACT model or a traditional CBT model for 6-8 sessions following a 2 session functional analysis. Participants with any normal outpatient problem were included, mostly anxiety and depression. At post and at the 6 month follow up ACT clients are more improved on the SCL-90 and several other measures. Greater acceptance for ACT patients; great self-confidence for CBT patients. Both correlated with outcomes, but when partial correlations are calculated, only acceptance still relates to outcome.
101 heterogeneous outpatients reporting moderate to severe levels of anxiety or depression were randomly assigned either to traditional CT or to ACT. 23 junior therapists were used. Participants receiving CT and ACT evidenced large and equivalent improvements in depression, anxiety, functioning difficulties, quality of life, life satisfaction and clinician-rated functioning. “Observing” and “describing” one’s experiences mediated outcomes for those in the CT group relative to those in the ACT group, whereas “experiential avoidance,” “acting with awareness” and “acceptance” mediated outcomes for those in the ACT group.
Small controlled trial. Shows that ACT is more effective that cognitive therapy for depression when presented in an individual format, and that it works by a different process.
Small controlled trial. Shows that ACT is as effective as cognitive therapy for depression when presented in a group format, and that it works by a different process.
Randomized controlled trial. Shows that ACT is more effective than a previously empirically supported behavioral approach to reducing worksite stress and anxiety, and that both are better than a wait list control. Process analyses fit the model.
Small randomized controlled trial shows that ACT is as good as systematic desensitization in reducing math anxiety, but works according to a different process. Systematic desensitization reduced trait anxiety more than did ACT.
Analog study. Shows that a 90 minute acceptance intervention drawn from the ACT protocol produces more pain tolerance than a pain control intervention drawn from Turk’s CBT pain management package.
98 participants with chocolate cravings were exposed to a well known CBT-based protocol (Kelly Brownell’s LEARN program) and an ACT-based protocol or no instructions and required to carry chocolate with them of for two days. Those more impacted by food related cues ate less and had fewer cravings in the ACT condition.
A large and well-controlled randomized study that replicated Hayes, Bissett, Korn, Zettle, Rosenfarb, Cooper, & Grundt, 1999. Acceptance methods drawn from the 1999 ACT book and from the Hayes et al. 1999 pain study (the methods used included an acceptance rationale, practicing awareness of experience, the “Passengers on the Bus” exercise, and the ‘Two Scales Metaphor’) increased pain tolerance and decreased pain ratings in a cold pressor task as compared both to suppression methods (based on thought stopping) and to participants preferred method of coping (which tended to include distraction, relaxation, and keeping the hand still). The latter two conditions did not differ from each other in the main analysis.
There are also studies showing that ACT methods can empower traditional behavioral methods, e.g.,
More recently studies have explained the effect of some cognitive variables in ACT terms, e.g.,
Some of the history of ACT, including its relation to CBT writ large, can be found in:
The theme of these articles has been to describe the contextual behavioral science approach to studying both ACT and RFT, its knowledge development strategy and to show its distinctive features.
Below is a list of articles that describe the relationship between RFT and ACT such as how RFT informs the ACT theory of psychopathology and intervention. Please contact Jen Plumb at jcplumb@gmail.com if you know of additional articles that would be good to include.
The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy is entering its 6th year of publication. IJBCT is an open- access, peer review journal. At this point we are shifting our focus to clinical behavior analysis papers. We are seeking discussions and empirical articles devoted to the "so- called" three waves of behavior therapy. We are interested in new and old approaches to most problems that require any level of an intervention. With the mindfulness based or involved interventions becoming more prevalent, we have an interest in articles examining Buddhist or Zen practices with a plethora of disorders.
Our hope is to add a print on-demand this year and move to an on-line and print format in the not too distant future. With these caveats in mind, we are asking that you consider IJBCT as an outlet for your publications. The journal is still available with open access at www.baojournal.com. Our editorial board includes many of the most distinguished scholars and probationers in the field today. Keep your eye on IJBCT, as we are a vital and growing peer -reviewed journal. Please send articles to Jack Apsche (ijbcteditor@gmail.com).
Best wishes,
Jack Apsche, Ed.D., ABPP
Part of the ACT/ RFT movement is a "grand vision" to affect positive change on the culture more generally. Groups and organizations engage in practices that harm individuals, families, and the environment, yet there is little scientific understanding of how to bring about changes in these practices.
A number of professionals throughout the world are conducting research on such topics as stigma, prejudice, prevention, advertising, child rearing, and environmental preservation among other important issues.
Here is where you will find information on specific applications of ACT to cultural issues with links to relevant researchers and studies.
Despite decades of social concern, racial, ethnic, and religious prejudice persists. Few cultural issues seem more important than figuring out why people hate and how to reduce discriminatory and violent behavior due to prejudice. It seems our survival may depend on our ability as human beings to solve this issue. ACT/ RFT is relevant not just to the needs of the victims of prejudice, discrimination, and terrorism, but also to the understanding and modification of psychological processes that lead to the perpetration of hateful and discriminatory acts.
From an ACT/ RFT perspective, prejudice can be defined as theobjectification and dehumanization of human beings because of their participation in verbal evaluative categories. Prejudice, defined this way, is a kind of verbal entanglement. It is difficult to avoid because some of the same cognitive processes that permit problem-solving also seem to foster prejudice. In addition, may of the things humans do to try and change or eliminate prejudice are either inert or prone to making these processes more resistant to change. Indeed, validated methods for reducing prejudice are very limited.
In this section are links to various ACT and RFT papers related to this topic.
Conceptual papers discussing prejudice/terrorism from an ACT/RFT perspective.
RFT studies related to prejudice and stereotyping
Empirical papers examining the impact of ACT on prejudice and stigma.
Undergraduates enrolled in two separate classes on racial differences were exposed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and an educational lecture drawn from a textbook on the psychology of racial differences in a counterbalanced order. Results indicate that only the ACT intervention was effective in increasing positive behavioral intentions at post and a 1-week follow-up. These changes were associated with other self-reported changes that fit with the ACT model.
An RCT comparing ACT and education in 95 college students. ACT reduced mental health stigma significantly regardless of participants’ pre-treatment levels of psychological flexibility, but education reduced stigma only among participants who were relatively flexible and non-avoidant to begin with.
A medium sized randomized controlled trial that found that a one day ACT workshop produces greater decreases in stigmatization of clients by therapists and greater decreases in therapist burnout than an educational control and (or some comparisons) than multicultural training. Mediational analyses fit the model.
For suggestions on doing ACT research, check out the attached talk Steve gave at the ACT SI II in Philadelphia, July 2005
The subsections divide the empirical ACT literature into several categories. If you have a study that should be added you can upload the actual publication into the publications section (click on the word "publications" at the left of any page of the site and then go to "create content" on the left and say it is a publication you want to add).
You can't add the reference to the publication here directly ... right now (Summer 2009) you have to email that information to the site editor and we will add it ... but if the publication itself is already uploaded we can link the reference here to that file so that people can find it and download it. If you just want a recent summary of the literature and of the model, click here.
Case Studies by Year (Controlled Time Series Studies are covered in the RCT page)
In Press
2008
2007
2006
2005
Case study. Shows improvement with a dually diagnosed patient.
A case study that examines a combination of ACT and FAP in the successful treatment of a case of Schizotypal Personality Disorder.
Discussion article and case study showing how to apply ACT to the treatment of PTSD.
2004
Case study. An ACT protocol with an emphasis on mindfulness helps with sports outcomes.
2003
This case study describes a heavily values focused ACT treatment of a case of alcohol dependence within an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy model. Identifying valued directions seemed to help the client achieve sobriety and put a plan into action to "start living."
A successful application of ACT to a 30-year-old male with difficulties in accepting his bisexual orientation and with an erectile dysfunction is presented.
Case study with a retarded psychotic person experiencing command hallucinations and multiple delusions. Believability drops dramatically over treatment but not frequency. Good functional improvement.
2002
Describes the use of ACT in anorexia and shows resulting data. Case study. The case study is followed by discussion articles:
- Wilson, K. G. & Roberts, M. (2002). Core principles in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An application to anorexia. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 237-243.
- Hayes, S. C. & Pankey, J. (2002). Experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, and an ACT approach to anorexia nervosa. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 243-247.
- Orsillo, S. M. & Batten, S. J. (2002). ACT as treatment of a disorder of excessive control: Anorexia. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 253-259.
- There is also a cognitive paper that is nominally a response to the case, but it mentions ACT only in passing, focusing instead on the traditional CBT model.
Presents data on ACT with a patient who failed a course of cognitive therapy.
2001
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of psychotic disorders and shows resulting data. Case study.
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of complicated bereavement and shows resulting data. Case study.
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of alcoholism and shows resulting data. Case study.
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of anxiety problems and shows resulting data. Case study.
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of chronic pain and shows resulting data. Case study.
Describes the use of ACT in the treatment of agoraphobia and shows resulting data. Case study.
2000
1999 and Earlier (First ACT Book Appears in 1999)
Uncontrolled. Presents case data on the use of ACT components with families.
Shows a series of uncontrolled case evaluations on ACT with anxiety problems.
Correlational studies on ACT-Related Processes by Year
See also the experimental psychopathology page
In Press
2009
2008
2007
In a sample of 187 elderly those higher in psychological acceptance had higher quality of life in the areas of health, safety, community participation and emotional well-being; and had less adverse psychological reactions to decreasing productivity.
This correlational study examined the hypothesis that experiential avoidance mediates associations between excessively materialistic values and diminished emotional well-being, meaning in life, self-determination, and gratitude. Results indicated that people with high materialistic values reported more negative emotions and less relatedness, autonomy, competence, gratitude, positive emotions, and sense of meaning – all of these relations were mediated by experiential avoidance mediated all of these relations. Emotional disturbances such as social anxiety and depressive symptoms failed to account for these findings after accounting for shared variance with experiential avoidance.
Correlational study with 730+ folks suffering from trichotillomania. Experiential avoidance as measured by the AAQ fully mediated the rela¬tionship between hair-pulling and both fears of negative evaluation and feelings of shame and partially mediated the relationship between hair-pulling severity and dysfunctional beliefs about appearance.
2006
Found that the impact of skin picking on depression and anxiety was partially mediated by the AAQ in a non-referred sample of chronic skin pickers.
two studies, one correlational and one longitudinal, show that experiential avoidance as measured by the AAQ fully or partially mediated the relationships between coping and emotion regulation strategies on anxiety-related pathology, (Sutdy 1) and psychological distress and hedonic functioning over the course of a 21-day monitoring period (Study 2). The variables examined included maladaptive coping, emotional responses styles, and uncontrollability on anxiety-related distress (e.g., anxiety sensitivity, trait anxiety, suffocation fears, and body sensation fears), and suppression and cognitive reappraisal on daily negative and positive experiences. The data showed that cognitive reappraisal, a primary process of traditional cognitive-behavior therapy, was much less predictive of the quality of psychological experiences and events in everyday life compared with EA.
In a 21-day experience sampling study, dispositional social anxiety, emotional suppression, and cognitive reappraisal was compared daily measures of social anxiety. Socially anxious individuals reported the lowest rate of positive events on days when they were more socially anxious and tended to suppress emotions, and the highest rate of positive events on days when they were less socially anxious and more accepting of emotional experiences. Irrespective of dispositional social anxiety, participants reported the most intense positive emotions on days when they were less socially anxious and more accepting of emotional experiences.
2005
Experiential avoidance as measured by the AAQ correlated positively with post-discharge parental stress and traumatic stress symptoms surrounding preterm birth. Moreover, it partially mediated the association between stress during delivery and later traumatic stress symptoms. This process was not moderated by parent reports of child temperament or perceived social support, suggesting that experiential avoidance plays a mediating role irrespective of child characteristics or perceived support from family members and close friends.
185 trauma survivors were assessed for peritraumatic dissociation, experiential avoidance (using the AAQ), and PTSD symptom severity. Both peritraumatic dissociation and experiential avoidance were significantly related to PTSD symptoms at baseline. After the initial levels of PTSD was taken into account, only experiential avoidance was related to PTSD symptoms both 4- and 8-weeks later.
Correlational study. Shows that the AAQ is associated with GAD symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical populations.
2004
In a large sample of adults suffering from trichotillomania, experiential avoidance as measured by the 9 item AAQ correlated with more frequent and intense urges to pull, less ability to control urges, and more pulling-related distress than persons who were not experientially avoidant. Actual pulling did not differ.
Study compared experiential avoidance (as measures by the AAQ) and emotional intelligence in terms of their ability to predict general mental health, physical well-being, and job satisfaction in workers (controlling for the effects of job control since this work organisation variable is consistently associated with occupational health and performance). Results from 290 United Kingdom workers showed that emotional intelligence did not significantly predict any of the well-being outcomes, after accounting for acceptance and job control. Acceptance predicted general mental health and physical well-being but not job satisfaction, Job control was associated with job satisfaction, only. Not controlling one’s thoughts and feelings (as advocated by acceptance) may have greater benefits for mental well-being than attempting consciously to regulate them (as emotional intelligence suggests).
The AAQ validation study. Over 2000 subjects. Validates both a 9 and 16 item version, both single factor.
See McCracken 1998
Correlational study. Showed that experiential avoidance was correlated with post-traumatic symptomatology over and above other measures of psychological functioning.
Correlational study. Among a sample of individuals exposed to multiple potentially traumatic events, general experiential avoidance (but not thought suppression in particular), predicted symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization when controlling for posttraumatic stress symptom severity. Thought suppression (but not experiential avoidance) was associated with severity of posttraumatic stress symptoms when controlling for their shared relationship with general psychiatric symptom severity.
2003
Shows that AAQ predicts positive work outcomes (mental health, satisfaction, performance) even one year later, especially in combination with job control. Re-factors the AAQ and shows that a two factor solution can work on a slightly different 16 item version.
2002
Correlational study showing that childhood sexual abuse (CSA), experiential avoidance and emotional expressivity were significantly related to psychological distress. However, only experiential avoidance mediated the relationship between CSA and current distress.
2001
This is a correlational study (N = 283) showing that generalized experiential avoidance accounted for 67% of the variance in distress in a sexually abused population.
1999 and earlier
This study is based on a pain related early version of the AAQ. Greater acceptance of pain was associated with reports of lower pain intensity, less pain-related anxiety and avoidance, less depression, less physical and psychosocial disability, more daily uptime, and better work status. A relatively low correlation between acceptance and pain intensity showed that acceptance is not simply a function of having a low level of pain. Regression analyses showed that acceptance of pain predicted better adjustment on all other measures of patient function, independent of perceived pain intensity. This work is replicated, refined and extended in McCracken, L. M. & Eccleston, C. (2003). Coping or acceptance: What to do about chronic pain. Pain, 105, 197-204. and McCracken, L. M. , Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: Component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159-166.
101 heterogeneous outpatients reporting moderate to severe levels of anxiety or depression were randomly assigned either to traditional CT or to ACT. 23 junior therapists were used. Participants receiving CT and ACT evidenced large and equivalent improvements in depression, anxiety, functioning difficulties, quality of life, life satisfaction and clinician-rated functioning. “Observing” and “describing” one’s experiences mediated outcomes for those in the CT group relative to those in the ACT group, whereas “experiential avoidance,” “acting with awareness” and “acceptance” mediated outcomes for those in the ACT group.
Randomized controlled study in which 14 student therapists treat one client each from an ACT model or a traditional CBT model for 6-8 sessions following a 2 session functional analysis. Participants with any normal outpatient problem were included. At post and at the 6 month follow up ACT clients are more improved on the SCL-90 and several other measures. Greater acceptance for ACT patients; great self-confidence for CBT patients. Both correlated with outcomes, but when partial correlations are calculated, only acceptance still relates to outcome.
108 chronic pain patients with a long history of treatment are followed through an ACT-based 3-4 week residential treatment program. Measures improved from initial assessment to pre-treatment on average only 3% (average of 3.9 month wait), but improved on average 34% following treatment. 81% of these gains were retained through a 3 month follow up. Changes in acceptance predicted positive changes in depression, pain related anxiety, physical disability, psychosocial disability, and the ability to stand. Positive outcomes were also seen in a timed walk, decreased medical visits, daily rest due to pain, pain intensity, and decreased pain medication use.
Controlled effectiveness trial. Not randomized. Shows that training in ACT produces generally more effective clinicians, as measured by client outcomes.
Experimental Psychopathology and Component Studies by Year
Below is a list of experimental psychopathology and analogue studies testing components of ACT. Intervention scripts for several of the studies are available here.
In Press
2008
2007
Two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants high (n = 15) or low in avoidance (n = 14), as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, completed a simple matching task that required them to choose whether or not to look at an aversive visual image. Only the high-avoidance participants took longer to emit a correct response that produced an aversive rather than a neutral picture. Additionally, the high-avoiders reported greater levels of anxiety following the experiment even though they rated the aversive images as less unpleasant and less emotionally arousing than their low-avoidant counterparts. In Experiment 2, three groups, representing high- mid- and low-avoidance (n = 6 in each) repeated the matching task with the additional recording of event related potentials (ERPs). The findings replicated Experiment 1 but also showed that high-EA subjects had significantly greater negativity for electrodes over the left hemisphere relative to the midline suggesting that the high-EA group engaged in verbal strategies to regulate their emotional responses.
98 participants with chocolate cravings were exposed to a CBT-based protocol and an ACT-based protocol or no instructions and required to carry chocolate with them of for two days. Those more impacted by food related cues ate less and had fewer cravings in the ACT condition.
examined the impact of acceptance and defusion with a radiant heat induction.
A large and well-controlled randomized study that replicated Hayes, Bissett, Korn, Zettle, Rosenfarb, Cooper, & Grundt, 1999. Acceptance methods drawn from the 1999 ACT book and from the Hayes et al. 1999 pain study (the methods used included an acceptance rationale, practicing awareness of experience, the “Passengers on the Bus” exercise, and the ‘Two Scales Metaphor’) increased pain tolerance and decreased pain ratings in a cold pressor task as compared both to suppression methods (based on thought stopping) and to participants preferred method of coping (which tended to include distraction, relaxation, and keeping the hand still). The latter two conditions did not differ from each other in the main analysis.
2006
Similar to the study above, brief acceptance methods led to lower heart rate during exposure to an aversive film and less negative affect during the post-film recovery period that did control strategies in individuals with anxiety and mood disorders.
This study compared the responses of participants from a clinical and non-clinical sample to an emotion provoking film. The study found that participants from the clinical group spontaneously used suppression to a greater degree than non-clinical participants and that attempts at suppression were associated with greater distress.
2005
Simple acceptance-based coping instructions improved affective pain more than distraction but only for women.
Tested acceptance- and control-based instructions in a cold pressor task. The result showed that the acceptance-based coping strategy could reduce self-reported pain, and that males and females reacted to the coping strategies differently. Females produced lower pain level following the acceptance-based strategy than males
Two studies. Correlational study shows suppressing personally relevant intrusive thoughts is associated with more thoughts, more distress, greater urge to do something. Those who accept are less obsessional, depressed and anxious. Experimental study shows that instructions to suppress does not work and leads to increased level of distress; instructions of accept (using a couple of short metaphors drawn from the ACT book) decreases discomfort but not thought frequency.
Correlational. High versus low EA participants show differences in pain tolerance and in pain coping.
2004
Shows in a series of time-series designs and a group study, that the “milk, milk, milk” defusion technique reduces distress and believability of negative self-referential thoughts
Randomized study with analogue pain task showing greater tolerance for pain in the defusion and acceptance-based condition drawn from ACT as compared to a closely parallel cognitive-control based condition.
Normal participants high or low on the AAQ were exposed to a CO2 challenge. High emotional avoiders reported more panic symptoms than low avoiders. No difference physiologically.
Acceptance methods (drawn directly from the ACT book) did a better job than control strategies in promoting successful exposure in panic disordered patients
Examined the relationship between emotional reactivity (self-report and physiological reactivity) to pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral emotion-eliciting stimuli and experiential avoidance as measured by the AAQ. Sixty-two participants were separated into high and low experiential avoiders. Results indicated that high EA participants reported greater emotional experience to both unpleasant and pleasant stimuli compared to low EA participants. In contrast to their heightened reports of emotion, high EA participants displayed attenuated heart rate reactivity to the unpleasant stimuli relative to the low EA participants. Findings were interpreted as reflecting an emotion regulation attempt by high EA participants when confronted with unpleasant emotion-evocative stimuli.
2003
Randomized study comparing control versus acceptance during a CO2 challenge with anxious subjects. Acceptance oriented exercise (the finger trap) reduced avoidance, anxiety symptoms, and anxious cognitions as compared to breathing training.
High emotional avoidance subjects showed more anxiety in response to CO2, particularly when instructed to suppress their emotions.
2002
Small randomized trial that replicated Hayes, Bissett, Korn, Zettle, Rosenfarb, Cooper, & Grundt, 1999. An acceptance rationale plus two ACT defusion exercises (leaves on the stream and physicalizing) did significantly better than a match control focused intervention on pain tolerance, or a lecture on pain.
1999 or Before
Analog study. Shows that an acceptance rationale drawn from the ACT protocol produces more pain tolerance than a pain control rationale drawn from a CBT pain management package.
Randomized Controlled Trials, Controlled Time Series Designs, and Within Group Designs by Year
Under Review
In Press
2009
2008
Included people (adults) with longstanding pain due to whiplash (WAD). A 10-session protocol was compared with a wait list control group, and found significant improvements following treatment in functioning and life satisfaction, as well as in psychological flexibility (as measured with PIPS).
2007
RCT showing that ACT + patient education is significantly better than patient education alone in producing good self-management and better blood glucose levels in lower SES patients with Type II diabetes. Effects at follow up are mediated by changes in self-management and greater psychological flexibility with regard to diabetes related thoughts and feelings.
Undergraduates enrolled in two separate classes on racial differences were exposed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and an educational lecture drawn from a textbook on the psychology of racial differences in a counterbalanced order. Results indicate that only the ACT intervention was effective in increasing positive behavioral intentions at post and a 1-week follow-up. These changes were associated with other self-reported changes that fit with the ACT model.
Augmenting continuing education with psychologically-focused group consultation: Effects on adoption of Group Drug Counseling. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training. An ACT-based supervision group following training in Group Drug Counseling increased adoption in drug and alcohol counselors.
An RCT comparing ACT and education in 95 college students. ACT reduced mental health stigma significantly regardless of participants’ pre-treatment levels of psychological flexibility, but education reduced stigma only among participants who were relatively flexible and non-avoidant to begin with.
A multiple baseline showing ACT reducing the use of marijuana in 3 clients. 2 relapsed to a degree at follow up.
Open trial with 14 adolescents. Good outcomes that continue to improve through follow up.
2006
Pre – post study shows that ACT workshop helps parents cope with the stress of raising autistic children.
Randomized trial comparing and ACT / DBT combo to TAU. Very strong outcomes on self-harm and other measures. Follow-up is not in this manuscript -- will follow in another publication. The buzz is that outcomes continue to improve; along with acceptance scores.
6 acceptance and mindfulness group sessions during 35 days including individual homework assignments. 8 of 10 participants completed the program. At 1 mo follow up 50 percent (of 8 completers) were non-smokers, and the rest showed a decrease in smoking at a rate between 45 and 75 percent. Increase of the acceptance aspect of mindfulness was correlated with non-smoking.
Multiple baseline showing very large reductions in OCD with an 8 session ACT protocol without in session exposure.
Multiple baseline. Good effects at post but less so at follow up.
A small randomized trial (25 completers) comparing ACT plus habit reversal to a wait list. Wait list subjects then receive ACT/HR. Solid hair pulling, anxiety, and depression outcomes, maintained at a 3 month follow up. Wait list participants also improve once they get ACT. AAQ moves and correlates well with outcomes.
2005
108 chronic pain patients with a long history of treatment are followed through an ACT-based 3-4 week residential treatment program. Measures improved from initial assessment to pre-treatment on average only 3% (average of 3.9 month wait), but improved on average 34% following treatment. 81% of these gains were retained through a 3 month follow up. Changes in acceptance predicted positive changes in depression, pain related anxiety, physical disability, psychosocial disability, and the ability to stand. Positive outcomes were also seen in a timed walk, decreased medical visits, daily rest due to pain, pain intensity, and decreased pain medication use.
2004
Large randomized trial showing that ACT is more helpful than traditional CBT in dealing with end stage cancer and works through a different process. Amazing data.
A small randomized controlled trial shows that a four hour ACT intervention reduced sick day usage by 91% over the next six months compared to treatment as usual in a group of chronic pain patients at risk for going on to permanent disability.
RCT showing that ACT significantly reduces depression among workers on sick leave.
Medium sized randomized controlled trial comparing ACT to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) as a method of smoking cessation. Quit rates were similar at post but at a one-year follow-up the two groups differed significantly. The ACT group had maintained their gains (35% quit rates) while the NRT quit rates had fallen (less than 10%). Mediational analyses shows that ACT works through acceptance and response flexibility.
A medium sized randomized controlled trial that found that a one day ACT workshop produces greater decreases in stigmatization of clients by therapists and greater decreases in therapist burnout than an educational control and (or some comparisons) than multicultural training. Mediational analyses fit the model.
A large randomized controlled trial was conducted with polysubstance abusing opiate addicted individuals maintained on methadone. Participants (n=114) were randomly assigned to stay on methadone maintenance (n=38), or to add ACT (n=42), or Intensive Twelve Step Facilitation (ITSF; n=44) components. There were no differences immediately post-treatment. At the six-month follow-up participants in the ACT condition demonstrated a greater decrease in objectively measured (through monitored urinalysis) opiate use than those in the methadone maintenance condition (ITSF did not have this effect). Both the ACT and ITSF groups had lower levels of objectively measured total drug use than did methadone maintenance alone.
Two small RCTs (N = 18; and N = 28) comparing a three session ACT protocol (two individual; one group) to two other conditions. As compared to yoga, significantly reduced seizures in the ACT condition; as compared to attention control, significantly reduced seizures and experiential avoidance, and significantly increased quality of life in the ACT condition at a one year follow up.
A series of controlled single case designs show that ACT, and ACT combined with habit reversal helps with hair pulling.
2003
Small randomized controlled trial shows that ACT is about as good as systematic desensitization in reducing math anxiety, but works according to a different process. Systematic desensitization reduced trait anxiety more. ACT results were better for high emotional avoiders. This is the only study so far with a negative effect size for ACT -- in this case in comparison to systematic desensitization.
2002
Shows that a three-hour ACT intervention reduces rehospitalization by 50% over a 4 month follow-up as compared to treatment as usual in the seriously mentally ill.
2000
Small RCT on the treatment of social anxiety. Compared ACT to Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy and to a no treatment control. Results indicated that ACT participants evidenced a significant increase in reported willingness to experience anxiety, a significant decrease in behavioral avoidance during public speaking, and a marginally decrease in anxiety during the exposure exercises as compared with the control group. Similar results were found for CBGT, but ACT found greater changes in behavioral avoidance.
Randomized controlled trial. Shows that ACT is more effective than a previously empirically supported behavioral approach to reducing worksite stress and anxiety, and that both are better than a wait list control.
Components from ACT were included as component of a successful program to reduce high risk sexual behavior in adolescents.
1999 and earlier(First ACT Book Appears in 1999)
Small controlled trial. Shows that ACT is as effective as cognitive therapy for depression when presented in a group format, and that it works by a different process. The effect sizes in favor of ACT are about .6
RCT on the distress felt by families of disabled children. Good outcomes. ACT included as a treatment for depression.
Small controlled trial focusing on process differences between ACT and CT. Only the Hamilton outcome is mentioned in this manuscript. Shows that ACT is more effective that cognitive therapy for depression when presented in an individual format, and that it works by a different process
Empirical Reviews of ACT Data
2010
2008
2006
Meta-analysis of ACT process evidence and ACT outcomes, current through Summer 2005.
2004
Tutorial review of the ACT literature current through late 2003.
Projects underway or recently completed that we know about
A large RCT on smoking using Zyban or Zyban plus ACT plus FAP is just finishing the follow up phase. Funded by NIDA. Better outcomes for Zyban plus ACT plus FAP. Liz Gifford and Steve Hayes are the investigators.
Liz Roemer, Sue Orsillo, and Dave Barlow are testing an ACT-related package with GAD. Funded by NIMH
Frank Bond has completed and is writing up two replications and extensions of the Bond and Bunce 2000 study
Fredrick Livheim (livheim@hotmail.com) has conducted a randomized prevention trial with ACT in a school setting. Sigificantly better stress outcomes including at a 6 month follow up
Heather Nash who was at University of Alaska, has relocated to Las Vegas. She has a study of ACT with eating disorders using a multiple baseline
John Forsyth and Maria Karekla (University of Albany) ran a small RCT comparing an Acceptance Framed version of Panic Control Therapy vs. a "treatment as usual" version of Panic Control Therapy for persons suffering from panic disorder. The results are being written up. Persons in the ACT Framed condition were far less likely to drop out of treatment just prior to interoceptive exposure compared with the TAU condition.
John Forsyth and Sean Sheppard (University at Albany) are about to launch a large RCT comparing the effectiveness of The Mindfulness & Acceptance Workbook for Anxiety in a National and International sample of people who view their anxiety and fear as a significant problem for them. The study website is not up yet, but the URL will be www.ACTforAnxiety.com. Stay tuned.
John Forsyth, Ed Hickling, Dan Silverman have finished the first arm of an effectiveness study evaluating a half day ACT workshop for people suffering from Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The study includes pre-workshop assessment and a 3 month follow-up, plus a treatment seeking MS control group that did not get the workshop. The second wave of data collection will be happening in Fall 08. Preliminary data (just workshop participants) show that the workshop significantly reduced depression (from moderate-to-severe range to mild range), thought suppression, and pain interference on quality of life. The sample is small at the moment. So, take these findings as preliminary.
Similar ACT-based anxiety protocols are being tested by Jill Levitt, and by Eifert, Forsyth, & Craske
Branstetter, A., Wilson, K. G., & Mutch, D. G. (August 2003). ACT and the treatment of psychological distress among cancer patients. Paper given at the World Conference on ACT, RFT, and the New Behavioral Psychology, Linköping, Sweden. Large randomized trial showing that ACT is more helpful than traditional CBT in dealing with end stage cancer and works through a different process. Amazing data. (Write it up Ann!)
There is a large trial of ACT for methamphetamine abuse underway under the direction of Matthew Stout in Australia
Randomized trial underway on ACT for command hallucinations in Australia. Under the direction of Fran Shawyer at the Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria. email: fshawyer@mhri.edu.au
Aki Masuda has replicated and extended his “milk, milk, milk” study showing that 3 seconds of repetition does as well as 20 s in reducing distress, compared to the rationale alone; but the 20 s version does best in reducing believability.
Julieann Pankey has found that the AAQ is highly correlated with complicated grieving.
Dosheen Cook has found that the AAQ-heath relationship is the same in Asian as in Caucasian populations
Meyer, B., & Chow, L. (2003, June). Preference for experiential/mindfulness versus rational/cognitive Therapy: The role of information processing styles and sociopolitical attitudes. Poster presented at the annual convention of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Weimar, Germany. Found that ACT was preferred by liberals … conservative preferred CBT. You can get this manuscript from b.meyer@roehampton.ac.uk
Greco, Dew, & Blomquist have a small uncontrolled pilot-feasibility study currently underway examining the impact of ACT for adolescents with chronic abdominal pain, anxiety, and depression (current enrollment = 10 teens/parents).
Greco has examined willingness and experiential avoidance among children who experience chronic abdominal pain and persistent headaches. Unpublished as of yet. After controlling for gender, age, and pain frequency, duration, and severity, higher levels of acceptance predicted life quality (Beta = .38), and experiential avoidance/fusion predicted greater use of school medical services and school restrooms during class time (Betas = .24 and .23, respectively), lower quality of life (Beta = -.49), higher anxiety (Beta = .64), and lower teacher-rated academic competence (Beta = -.29).
Greco, Dew, & Baer have a manuscript underway that presents psychometric properties of the Willingness and Action Measure (WAM), Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire (AFQ), and Child Acceptance and Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Findings suggest that the WAM and CAMM correlate positively with positive functioning, whereas scores on the AFQ correlate positively with physical and emotional symptoms and school disability.
Greco & Russell (2004) evaluated the short-term effects of participating in a summer camp for diabetic youth and investigated the extent to which psychological acceptance moderated children’s response to camp. Psychological acceptance (using the WAM) moderated the relation between pre- and post-camp diabetes self-care behavior, with self-care ratings increasing most when psychological acceptance was high (Beta = .24, p < .05).
Laurie Greco is testing out ACT with eating disorders
Heather Murray, James Herbert, and Evan Forman have a group ACT vs group CBT RCT for Smoking Cessation underway
Laura Ely and Kelly Wilson have a small (n = 10) open trial with college students at risk for drop out. Showed improvements on grades and on many of the subscales of the LASSI (study skills inventory) such as time management and using study aids which were never directly addressed
Debra Moore and Kelly Wilson have a small (n = 20) RCT on teens at risk for highschool drop out. Data being entered
Irish ACT studies (all at NUI Maynooth and all involving the Barnes-Holmes team):
Claire Keogh is working on an extension of the Masuda
study on defusion. So far the data are consistent with the original.
Claire Keogh, Hilary-Anne Healy have completed a study on the utility of a defusion statement ("I am having the thought that" when presented in the context of positively and negatively evaluated self-referential statements in an automated procedure. Good data
Anne Keogh is comparing acceptance and control as interventions with experimentally induced radiant heat pain. Data is looking good for acceptance. May be a gender diff
Andy Cochrane, is looking at acceptance and a behavioral approach task relevant to spider phobia. All interventions fully automated. No data yet.
Geraldine Scanlon is working with a sample of ADHD kids on self-esteem, trying to replicate the recent study of me-good and me-bad relations published in the Record by Rhonda and Kelly.
Claire Campbell is investigating the PASAT and mirror tracing procedures for stress tolerance and applying ACT interventions to them.
Fodhla Coogan and Loretto Cunningham are looking at experimental analogues of experiential avoidance in the context of equivalence relations and aversive versus positive pictures.
Kevin Vowles and John Sorrell have been piloting a group treatment for chronic pain patients integrating the traditional educational stuff that is often part of psychological treatments for pain (e.g., meds, exercise, nutrition, sleep, communication) with ACT. The treatment consists of eight 90-minute sessions. Data so far look good
Frank Gardner at La Salle has a study being written up that shows that
1. Individuals who score high on measures of anger (STAXI) also score high on experiential avoidance and low on emotion regulation.
2. Individuals who score high on anger AND demonstrate behavioral dysregulation are likely to have a significant aversiove early life history (across multiple domains) unlike those patients with behavior dysregulation with minimal anger. These same patients score much lower on QOLI and a values assessment that we have bveen using as well.-
3. The AAQ predicts early termination from treatment (explaining 51% of the variance)... when directly targeted with a a 10 minute "psychoeducation" about experiential avoidance premature termination (69% of which occurs between intake and session 1) is reduced by 50%.
Jason Luoma at University of Nevada, Reno is conducting a randomized trial comparison an introductory 2-day workshop on ACT to the same workshop plus six sessions of phone consultation on learning ACT.
Brandon Gaudiano is conducting a pilot study of a novel psychosocial treatment integrating behavioral activation and ACT for patients with Major Depressive Disorder, severe with psychotic features.
Jen Plumb and Steven Hayes examined the relationship between personal values and depression using the PVQ (Blackledge & Ciarrochi). Found that depressed individuals were more likely to report low success at living consistently with values across domains than non-depressed individuals, and the discrepancy between values success and importance was related more strongly to psychological functioning in depressed individuals than non-depressed individuals. When depressed individuals were low on success at living consistently with their values they were more likely to endorse pliant and avoidance based reasons for choosing those values than non-depressed controls.
Jen Plumb, Mike Levin and Steven Hayes are examining the potentially motivative effects of values statements on studying behavior in college students. Two studies are underway (data collection phase). One examines self-monitoring of study behavior versus a simple values intervention in addition to self-monitoring. The other examines the differential effects of aversive values motivation (e.g., pliant, avoidant functions) as opposed to appetitive values motivation (e.g., choice, awareness of the reinforcement from living consistent with values) on studying behavior.
Ernst Bohlmeijer is in the process of pilot testing an intervention integrating ACT and mindfulness for clients experiencing various forms of psychological distress.
JoAnne Dahl and students have RCTs underway in smoking, OCD, and obesity.
Jason Lillis (Nevada) has an RCT just finish in obesity and weight maintenance with nice outcomes. ACT lead significantly lower weight and blood pressure outcomes, lower self-stigma, and higher quality of life. Changes were mediated by ACT processes.
JoAnne Dahl has an RCT underway with headache and one with social phobia
Mónica Hernández-López Jesús Gil Roales-Nieto & Carmen Luciano Soriano have a completed smoking RCT comparing ACT to CBT with good outcomes
Julie Wetherell at UCSD and the VA there (working with Niloo Afari, who recently joined their faculty) have a VA grant to compare ACT to CBT in 100 chronic pain patients.
Gerhard Andersson has found that tinnitus acceptance and action mediates the relationship between distress over tinnitus and depression, quality of life, and further distress over tinnitus seven months later. Being written up.
Nancy Kocovski, Jan Fleming, & Neil Rector (U of Toronto) have an ACT protocol (they call it Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Group Therapy) for social anxiety that is working well and is headed toward a randomized controlled trial
Tobias Lundgren just finished an ACT RCT for adolescents diagnosed with Aspergers syndrome. The study involved a 12 week treatment program with a 2 months follow up. Significant interaction effects were found on depression, anxiety and stress scales in favor of the treatment group. Furthermore, significant interaction effects were found on attention ability and teacher ratings on troublesome behavior as compared to a waiting list.
Study underway by Andrew Gloster and colleagues at the Institute of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy in Dresden, Germany, grant funded by the German government entitled: What Should We Do When CBT for Panic/Agoraphobia Fails: ACT! The goal is to test whether ACT can help those patients who are categorized as non-responders following an intense course of CBT.
Studies underway at the School of Psychology, University of Wollongong
1) Billich, Ciarrochi, & Deane have completed a wait-list control trial of ACT with the NSW police. The research suggests that ACT improves mental health, at least in the short run. We are writing this up for publication (This is funded by the Australian Research Council)
2) Fisher and Ciarrochi are conducting a cross-sectional study on personal values and quality of life amongst clients with Cancer. We are examining whether people have better adjustment and mental health when they tend to hold values for authentic reasons (e.g., vitality) rather than controlled reasons (e.g., external pressure), and when they tend to succeed at authentically held values.
3) Ciarrochi and Bailey (in press) have developed a new measure that is designed to aid values clarification. The measure is called the Survey of Life Principles (SLP), and is currently being evaluated in a number of studies. Stefanic and Ciarrochi are examining the psychometric properties of the SLP. Frearson & Ciarrochi are evaluating it in the context of couples satisfaction. Bayliss and Ciarrochi are evaluating it in the context of the police force.
4) Bayliss and Ciarrochi have done a small longitudinal study amongst NSW police recruits, following them from police recruit (Time 1) to one year in the police force (Time 2). Mindfulness, low experiential avoidance, and emotion identification skill were significant predictors of mental health at Time 2, even after controlling for mental health at Time 1. We are in the process of writing this up. (This is funded by the Australian Research Council)
5) We are now in the seventh year of a large longitudinal study of adolescents (now aged 17). Supavadeeprasit and Ciarrochi are preparing a manuscript that looks at experiential avoidance (in grade 8) predicting future social and emotional well-being. Jordan & Ciarrochi have also been looking at the measurement of mindfulness amongst adolescents and its ability to predict future levels of social and emotional well-being (The longitudinal study is been funded by the Australian Research Council and the National Health and Medical Research Council).
6) Ciarrochi, Lane, & Blackledge have developed an internet-based ACT intervention for people diagnosed with cancer. We are in the process of evaluating its efficacy. (This has been funded by the NSW Cancer Council).
Additional information about research being conducted in Australia and New Zealand can be found here.
This page is a working list of available resources for writing and submitting NIH grants. Please contact the site administrators or add a child page at the bottom of this page to add additional resources.
This page includes a list of resources for learning about the grant application process and how to write successful grants.
There are several power point presentations by Steven Hayes and Jacqueline Pistorello posted at the bottom of this page. These slides were developed for a grant class taught at the University of Nevada - Reno and cover different aspects of grant writing and submission.
Describes the different types of funding mechanisms (RO1, K, etc...) for NIH.
Walks through the different steps for submitting a grant.
Provides useful suggestions on how to write and what to include in each of the grant sections for clinical research grant submitted to NIH.
"The Center for Scientific Review has produced a video of a mock study section meeting to provide an inside look at how NIH grant applications are reviewed for scientific and technical merit. The video shows how outside experts assess applications and how review meetings are conducted to ensure fairness. The video also includes information on what applicants can do to improve the chances their applications will receive a positive review."
Provides information regarding how to submit your grant electronically, including common errors and required software
If you have an ongoing grant on ACT please add a child page and describe it!
Here are a few we know about:
Jacqueline Pistorello and Steven Hayes at the University of Nevada (with co-investigators Tony Biglan and John Seely at Oregon Institue) have been awarded a 5 year 2.6 million dollar grant from the National Institute on Mental Health (2008 - 2013) to examine the impact of ACT on the prevention of behavioral health problems in 18-20 year old college students.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Stigma and Burnout in Addiction Counselors,” R01 DAO17868, August 1, 2005- July 31, 2008, S. C. Hayes, Principal-investigator.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Reducing Felt Stigma in SUD,” $435,000, 2003-2006, Barbara S. Kohlenberg, Principle investigator.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Distress Tolerance Treatment for Early Smoking Lapsers,” $1,068,000, 2003-2006, Richard Brown, Principle investigator
National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Acceptance Therapy During Methadone Detoxification,” 2005-2008, Angela L. Stotts, University of Texas-Houston Medical School
If you are looking for resources to assist in applying for a grant, the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies has a useful list of links to learn more about grants and funding sources that can be accessed here.
Title: Acceptance Therapy During Methadone Detoxification
Funding Agency: NIDA (Behavioral Therapies Development Program)
PI: Angela L. Stotts, University of Texas-Houston Medical School
Dates: Fall 2005 through 2008
Abstract:
Opiate dependence is a severe and costly societal problem. While methadone maintenance (MM) is effective for managing this disorder, as many as 70% of MM clients are interested in detoxification in order to achieve a drug-free life. To date, however, success rates for opiate detoxification are very low, in part, due to physical and psychological symptoms and fears associated with opiate withdrawal. Few behavior therapies have been developed to promote abstinence during and subsequent to opiate dose reduction and even fewer treatment models have devoted sufficient attention to the distressing experiences specific to methadone withdrawal. A novel behavioral treatment, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is based on the idea that attempts to avoid private experience (thoughts, feelings, memories, bodily sensations) are ubiquitous yet often pathogenic. Given that opiate dependent individuals in detoxification often resort to opiate use to reduce, escape or avoid commonly experienced fear, anxiety, and physical symptoms, ACT seems uniquely applicable to the opiate detoxification experience. By decreasing experiential avoidance during dose reduction, ACT has the potential to significantly increase methadone detoxification success rates.
The proposed Stage I research will develop and test an innovative ACT-based opiate detoxification behavioral therapy within the context of a long-term methadone dose reduction program. In Phase 1, investigators will develop the new therapy based on previous ACT protocols, focus groups, and expert knowledge. Phase 2 will consist of a pilot trial to evaluate the ACT-based opiate detoxification therapy. A randomized, controlled, between groups design will be used in which opiate dependent patients (N=70) motivated for detoxification are assigned to one of two treatment conditions: ACT or Drug Counseling. A 4-week stabilization period will precede a 5-month dose reduction period using an inverse exponential dosing strategy, with 1-month follow-up. Behavioral treatments will consist of 24 weekly sessions beginning in stabilization. Specific aims are to test the feasibility and acceptability of ACT for opiate detoxification, to assess patient improvement (e.g., drug use, HIV/Hepatitis C risk behavior, psychosocial functioning), to generate sufficient data to provide a basis for a power analysis, and to evaluate the active mechanisms of change in ACT: experiential avoidance as a mediator of treatment effects and a moderator of the impact of withdrawal symptoms, negative affect and detoxification fear.
The work will be conducted using the rigorous procedures of our Treatment Research Clinic (SARC, UT-Health Science Center-Houston) in collaboration with experts in behavior therapy development and the originators of ACT. The research will contribute both theoretically and empirically to a rather sparse literature concerning effective behavior therapy for opiate detoxification. Effective treatment provided in conjunction with detoxification from agonist medication could result in significant decreases in the substantial health and social costs associated with chronic opiate dependence.
Contact information:
Angela L. Stotts, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of Texas-Houston Medical School
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
1300 Moursund Ave.
Houston, TX 77030
713-500-2720
713-500-2849 fax
Angela.L.Stotts@uth.tmc.edu
Tapper, K., Shaw, C. & Moore, L. Development and piloting of a mindfulness-based intervention for overweight and obese women. Welsh Office of Research and Development. March 2006 – May 2007, £58,912.
For further details please contact Katy Tapper at TapperK@cf.ac.uk.
Title: Development of a Psychosocial Treatment for Psychotic Depression
Funding Agency: National Institute of Mental Health
Grant Number: K23 MH076937
Principle Investigator: Brandon Gaudiano, PhD (Brown University/Butler Hospital)
Period: 2007-2012
Description: The aim of this project is to conduct a pilot study of a novel psychosocial treatment for patients with Major Depressive Disorder, severe with psychotic features. The proposed treatment will integrate behavioral activation therapy and ACT.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse has awarded a $1.1 M grant to University of Nevada, Reno to study burnout in addiction counselors. Housed in the Department of Psychology at UNR under Dr. Steven Hayes's direction, the three year study will examine the relative impact of various methods for alleviating stress and burnout. Co-investigators are UNR faculty Nancy Roget (Center for the Application of Substance Abuse Technologies), Barbara Kohlenberg (Psychiatry), and Jason Luoma (Psychology).
Substance abuse is one of the most difficult problems to treat, and addiction counselors are not immune to the negative attitudes and feelings that comes from working with difficult clients. Reducing providers entanglement with their own negative thoughts may be particularly important because there is evidence that these processes contribute to provider burnout, job turnover, and to decreased effectiveness in working with people in need.
There are few well developed methods for the alleviation of entanglement with negative attitudes toward recipients of care, however. This grant will evaluate two methods for the reduction of the harmful impact of thoughts of this kind: Multicultural Training and Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT). Alone and in combination these will be compared to training in the biological processes that underlying addiction since it has been argued that understanding that addiction is a disease reduces bias toward people suffering from addition.
Multicultural Training is widely used to help providers be more aware of their biases and to see the world to the eyes of others. Usually this approach is applied to cultural or racial bias, but it seems equally applicable to appreciating the inside world of people with addictions.
ACT, developed here at UNR by Dr. Hayes, is an increasingly popular new form of therapy is based on mindfulness, acceptance, and values. In this study it will be used to teach providers to notice their difficult thoughts and feelings more the way a meditator might notice thoughts that comes up during meditation, and then to focus on what they can do with actual behavior to further their values.
Multicultural knowledge is known to be important when working with clients who comes from different cultural group, but there is also some evidence that providers sometimes feel guilty about their own biases when they learn to detect them. This study will see if the combination mindfulness and multicultural training can reduce this problem, allowing providers to use multicultural knowledge more effectively.
In workshops conducted across the country about 300 providers will be randomly assigned to the four conditions and will be trained in two day workshops. Pre, post, and follow-up measures will be taken on stress and burnout, and providers entanglement with negative thoughts about difficult clients, among other measures. It is expected that both treatments will have initially positive effects on stigma and burnout, but based on previous research it is expected that acceptance and mindfulness may have a longer term impact on the burnout provides feel as a result of working with such difficult cases.
This study is the largest randomized study ever done on multicultural training, It is also one of the larger randomized trials ever done on therapists burnout, and on mindfulness-based training. The study is funded by the National Institute on Substance Abuse, which has supported several other successful studies on ACT over the last decade.
For additional information, contact Steve Hayes at hayes@unr.edu
Grant Title: Treatment Development for Comorbid Major Depression and Social Phobia
Funding Agency: National Institute of Mental Health
Grant Number: K23 MH085730
Principal Investigator: Kristy Dalrymple, Ph.D.
Institution: Rhode Island Hospital/Alpert Medical School of Brown University
Period: 1/2010 - 12/2014
Description: A Mentored Patient-Oriented Career Development Award to develop and pilot test an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for adults with comorbid major depression and social phobia.
This page includes a list of resources for finding funding opportunities (PAs, RFAs).
Searchable database that can be used to identify any previously funded grants.
Searchable database for funding announcements (RFAs and PAs).
Archived list of emails from the NIMH newsletter describing funding opportunities and other grant relevant information. Also, provides a link to join
It seems important to let the world know about ACT research failures. If you have any, add a daughter page and describe the study as well as you can to let the community know about it. If you have ideas about why it might not have worked, feel free to list them -- understanding that the other alternative is that it did not work because it does not work! If you have actual data about the population or treatment characteristics that predict failure, that would be especially important.
There is only one study so far published with a negative effect size for ACT as compared to something else:
Zettle, R. D. (2003). Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) versus systematic desensitization in treatment of mathematics anxiety. The Psychological Record, 53, 197-215.
This study compared ACT to systematic desensitization. The recent meta-analysis of the ACT literature included it and you can download the study from this website. Rob found that ACT worked better than a control condition, as did desensitization. On measures of math anxiety, ACT and desensitization were not statistically significantly different, but the d was in the wrong direction, and on general levels of overall anxiety, desensitization was better.
In 1999 ACT book we said this about fitting a fairly challenging intervention like ACT to the problem: "Before ACT begins, the client must be prepared for it. It can be an intensive intervention and the clients should not be subjected to such interventions lightly." In line with that, it seems possible that Math Anxiety is too low level of a problem to warrant ACT. Interestingly, in Zettle's study highly experientially avoidant participants did better in ACT than those who were not avoidant -- while the same did not hold true for desensitization.
I have had many failures replicating the Hayes et al (1999) pain tolerance study. Over the years I have answered criticisms of reviewers in my attempt to have negative results published. As a result I have begun to video record my interventions for analysis by anyone who is interested. I now take a whole host of adherence measures and subjective reports. I have even examined acceptance over the long run in the lab. But still no effects on pain tolerance for ACT-derived protocols over placebos or alternative treatments (relaxation and education or supression). often no effects for acceptance-based interventions at all.
I would love to offer practical suggestions but as you will see from my list I have five years of research here - so I am trying! I am all out of suggestions. I also think that if the procedure has to be contrived so much that effects are only measureable on such measures as the AAQ (which measures what ACT teaches the client - ipso facto we will see changes in scores) or if the research requires a clincian as experimenter or highly elaborate and exhaustive subjective ratings and statistical techniques - its not a very powerful effect! So I hesitate to contrive procedures much mroe complex than what I have got. (The details of which I hope we will discuss as a community in reposne to these postings).
So here is my list of failures....
Failure 1
Examining the effectiveness of acceptance and control – based interventions on pain tolerance.
This study compared the effectiveness of an acceptance-based and control-based intervention on pain tolerance using a cold pressor task, and is a part-replication and extension of the Hayes et al., (1999) study. Twenty college students were exposed to the cold pressor task before, immediately after, and 20 minutes subsequent, to an 8 minute acceptance-based or control-based therapeutic intervention, including the use of physical and abstract metaphors. Half of the participants were also assigned to a high demand characteristic condition in which the experimenter purposely placed subtle social pressure on them to please the experimenter. The results showed that the most significant factor influencing performance on the cold pressor task was the effect of placing social pressure on participants, with no significant overall effect for Acceptance or Control interventions.
Failure 2
A Systematic Analysis of the Role of Demand Characteristics in an Acceptance Based Approach to Pain Tolerance.
This study compared the role of demand characteristics in an acceptance-based approach to pain tolerance and both the long and short-term effects of the acceptance-based versus the no therapy interventions. Forty participants were exposed to a cold pressor task before and immediately after a short intervention. Twenty-eight participants also completed a follow up task three months later. Half of the participants receiving each intervention were also subject to high levels of demand characteristics. In this high demand condition the experimenter placed subtle social pressure on the participants to perform well on the second cold pressor task. The findings showed that participants in the acceptance condition improved more, but not significantly more, than those in the no therapy condition. Participants in the high demand condition performed significantly better than those in the low demand condition. Interaction effects for therapy x demand were also found between the experimental groups.
Failure 3
Comparing the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Control Strategies for Pain Tolerance with a Sub-clinical Population
This study used an experienced psycho synthesis therapist and cognitive behavior therapy postgraduate as an experimenter who had studied ACT and taken the full ACT weekend workshop. This study was a part replication and extension of the Hayes, Bissett, Korn, Zettle, Rosenfarb, Cooper and Grunt (1999) study. Four sub-clinical volunteers (two smokers, one drinker and a tantrum thrower) were exposed to a cold pressor task before, immediately after, and several weeks subsequent to a 90 minute acceptance-based therapeutic intervention. Baseline rates of idiosyncratic problem behaviours were also recorded prior to, and for several weeks subsequent to, the initial intervention. The acceptance-based intervention was then administered weekly for up to 25 weeks by a qualified cognitive-behavior therapist to asses its impact on pain tolerance and target problem behaviour rates in the longer term. The acceptance-based intervention showed weak effects on pain tolerance during all phases of the study and no discernible effects on problem behaviors were observed (in fact they got worse!).
Failure 4
Examining the effectiveness of an acceptance and relaxation-based intervention on pain tolerance
This study attempted to compare the effectiveness of an acceptance and relaxation-based intervention on pain tolerance to a cold pressor task and is a partial replication and extension of the Hayes et al., (1999) study. Forty college students were exposed to a cold pressor task before and immediately after an eight minute acceptance-based and relaxation-based intervention. Half of the participants in each group were also assigned to a high demand condition, in which subtle social pressure was placed on the participants to please the experimenter and do well in the task. The results confirmed that the most significant factor influencing performance on the cold pressor task was placing social pressure on participants to do well. There was no significant overall effect for either the acceptance or relaxation-based intervention although both produced mild improvements in pain tolerance.
Failure 5
The effectiveness of an acceptance and control-based interventions on pain tolerance at two different levels of pain in a cold pressor task.
This study employed the now standard procedure of using 40 subjects – half get an acceptance protocol and half get a control-based protocol following a baseline cold pressor task and before a post-intervention cold pressor task. Half of each group get cold pressors at 0 degrees centigrade – the remainder at 3 degrees. Acceptance has a mild effect – not significant – and does not interact with temperature on an ANOVA. This dashed our hopes that maybe acceptance was more useful for intense pain over mild pain – no lab data to support that idea yet.
Failure 6
So maybe it’s the subject’s fault! Assessing the effectiveness of acceptance and control based interventions with anxious and non-anxious subjects.
We recruited 20 high and 20 low trait anxiety subjects by screening with the STAI. We defined high and low as one SD above and below the mean score as outlined in the standardized distribution scores. Half of each got a control intervention and half got acceptance. Anxious subjects did not benefit more than non anxious from either the acceptance or the control intervention on a cold pressor task. Overall no effect for acceptance. No effects were found on any subjective reports.
Aki Masuda tested ACT versus education for reducing stigma against mental health patients in an RCT. The interventions were both very short (2.5 hours) and the sample was one of convenience (Intro Psych students). Both conditions reduced stigmatizing attitudes signficantly and gains were maintained at a 2 month follow up but there was no difference between them.
The study was Aki's dissertation at UNR. You should be able to get it at Dissertation Abstracts International late in 2006.