Skip to main content

Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial

Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (JCBS)
Volume 32, April 2024

Authors

Huiyuan Li, Cho Lee Wong, Xiaohuan Jin, Yuen Yu Chong, Marques Shek Nam Ng

Abstract

Background

Cancer-related fatigue is common in patients with advanced lung cancer, persistently interfering with their health-related quality of life. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in the advanced lung cancer population. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an ACT-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

An assessor-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial with 160 patients with advanced lung cancer was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated into either a four-week ACT-based intervention group (n = 80) or usual care control group (n = 80). The intervention consisted of a face-to-face session and three video-conferencing-based sessions and was delivered on an individual basis. The primary outcomes were fatigue interference and health-related quality of life. The secondary outcomes included cancer-related fatigue, depression and anxiety, cancer-specific distress, and activity level. Changes in psychological flexibility (PF), experiential avoidance, and cognitive fusion were also evaluated. Outcomes were measured at baselines (T0), one-week post-intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2). The intervention effects were assessed using generalised estimating equation models.

Results

Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue interference (T1: β = −0.50, p < 0.001; T2: β = −0.16, p = 0.007), health-related quality of life (T1: β = 16.01, p < 0.001; T2: β = 11.21, p < 0.001), depression (T1: β = −0.32, p < 0.001) and anxiety (T1: β = −0.20, p < 0.001), cancer-specific distress (T1: β = −7.37, p < 0.001; T2: β = −8.00, p < 0.001), activity level (intensity, T1: β = 3.24, p = 0.004; T2: β = 2.61, p = 0.020; frequency, T1: β = 2.44, p < 0.001; T2: β = 1.96, p < 0.001; duration, T1: β = 1.36, p < 0.001), PF (T1: β = 5.54, p < 0.001; T2: β = 8.63, p < 0.001), experiential avoidance (T1: β = −7.70, p < 0.001; T2: β = −10.07, p < 0.001), and cognitive fusion (T2: β = −3.31, p = 0.007). The changes in experiential avoidance at one-week post-intervention mediated the effects of ACT on reducing cancer-specific distress (β = −7.40, p < 0.001; β = −3.68, 95%CI, −5.77 to −1.58) and promoting HRQoL (β = 11.15, p < 0.001; β = 5.49, 95%CI, 3.09 to 8.31) at three-month follow-up. The changes in PF at one-week post-intervention mediated the effect of ACT on HRQoL (β = 11.15, p < 0.001; β = 2.25, 95%CI, 0.66 to 4.19) at three-month follow-up.

Conclusions

ACT-based intervention can effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. The intervention can be integrated into palliative care within the cancer system to contribute to the well-being of patients with advanced cancer.

This article is restricted to ACBS members. Please join or login with your ACBS account.